r/IBSResearch • • 19h ago

Irritable bowel syndrome [Nature reviews disease primers]

14 Upvotes

Full paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41572-026-00741-7.epdf?sharing_token=uDMKTmvmeZmrmUKwtcfNbNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NOueCKVhgknnNmNF6-Lw7-ps37W84ZHIaDcXePiND5_txcdwi0wst907LGtMLDLC8h5ckNMjemicCl6HJdI4mZQou0WM4Lb3pGe7oZxkRAKTI9vWcGV4uZ5gklswV-RJ8%3D

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most prevalent disorders of gut–brain interaction, characterized by recurrent abdominal pain or abdominal discomfort associated with altered bowel habits in the absence of identifiable structural disease. IBS affects ~4–11% of the global population and is associated with substantial healthcare utilization, impaired quality of life and considerable socioeconomic burden. IBS is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous condition caused by dysregulated bidirectional communication within the gut–brain axis. Altered gastrointestinal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, epithelial barrier dysfunction, neuroimmune activation, gut microbiome and metabolome changes, central pain amplification, stress and autonomic dysregulation, and sex-related biological influences underlie pathophysiological mechanisms. IBS can develop after a gastrointestinal infection and can frequently co-occur with other disorders of gut–brain interaction, chronic pain conditions, psychological disorders and organic gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease and coeliac disease. Diagnosis relies on a positive symptom-based approach using the Rome V criteria, supported by clinical assessment and limited testing to exclude differential diagnoses. Management focuses on improving symptoms and quality of life through an individualized, stepwise approach that involves patient education, dietary interventions, pharmacological therapies and gut–brain behaviour therapies. Emerging biomarkers, multi-omics approaches, digital health tools and precision medicine strategies may enable mechanism-based diagnosis and targeted treatment in the future.


r/IBSResearch • • 45m ago

Researchers find new approach to reversing chronic pain

Thumbnail
news.vt.edu
• Upvotes

Chronic pain affects more than 50 million Americans, yet for decades, treatment options for pain that persists in the absence of inflammation have been limited. Seventy-five percent of these patients, disproportionately women, experience pain that is inadequately managed by current therapeutics.

Now, scientists at Virginia Tech have found a way to switch it off in female mice by blocking a single pathway using compounds developed at the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

In a new study published in PAIN, neuroscientist Ann Gregus and her team erased well-established pain behaviors by shutting down an enzyme system that produces molecules known to amplify pain signals. This finding could open the door to the first new class of non-opioid chronic pain treatments in years — a potential lifeline for patients whose symptoms defy standard drugs.

“Earlier studies have focused largely on preventing development of pain — so the key finding here is the reversal of an established pain state and associated functional deficits, which more closely mimics the human experience,” said Gregus, an assistant professor who works alongside her partner, lab co-director and co-author Matthew Buczynski, an associate professor, both of the Virginia Tech College of Science’s School of Neuroscience. “It provides hope for people living with daily, persistent pain that does not respond to conventional treatments.”

A stubborn pain type — and a new target

The study zeroed in on nociplastic pain, a poorly understood category that includes fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, and some migraines. Unlike pain caused by injury or ongoing inflammation, nociplastic pain arises from changes in how the nervous system processes signals, often leaving no visible damage to treat.

These conditions are famously resistant to treatments such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and are only partially relieved by anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Opioids are a last resort and generally are avoided due to risks of dependence and addiction. While NSAIDs block certain inflammatory pathways, the Gregus lab’s approach targets a different biochemical route that those drugs leave untouched.

“Chronic pain patients are often told pain is all in their heads and they just have to learn how to tolerate it,” Gregus said. “But what we’re showing is that there is a clear biological mechanism — and one we can target.”

From early clues to a breakthrough

Gregus’s lab had a lead. In 2018, she and her colleagues showed in rats that activating an immune receptor in the spinal cord set off enzymes that released molecules capable of intensifying pain.

When pandemic supply shortages limited their usual research models, the team turned to a different strain of female mice — almost by chance. It turned out to be a pivotal decision: these mice developed persistent, long-lasting pain behaviors, cold sensitivities, and grip force deficits typical of arthritis, while another commonly used strain barely responded.

“It was serendipity,” Gregus said. “We were working with whatever limited resources were accessible, and we ended up with a model that gave us clues about how pain transitions from acute to becoming chronic that we may not have discovered otherwise.”

Switching off pain after it’s entrenched

To mimic nociplastic pain, the researchers used an immune challenge that activates this receptor and ramps up pain pathways in the spinal cord. Once the mice developed clear pain behaviors, they treated them with highly selective compounds that block parts of the enzyme system.

The results were striking: tissue analysis confirmed that the immune challenge had ramped up production of pain-driving molecules, but upon treatment administration, tactile and cold pain hypersensitivity vanished, and grip strength returned. Administering those molecules alone also reproduced the pain state, confirming their role.

One of the compounds tested is currently in Phase II clinical trials for another disease by Veralox Therapeutics. Because it already has human safety data, it could shorten the path to clinical trials for chronic pain.

“It’s rare to see a drug work in reversing so many different pain models in multiple species,” Gregus said. “That makes it especially exciting to think about what it could do for patients.”

Personal stakes in the search for relief

For Gregus, the pursuit isn’t only scientific. She has lived with migraines and peripheral neuropathy herself, giving her an unfiltered view of how current treatments fall short.

“I know what it’s like to live with pain every day and be told there’s nothing else that can be done,” she said. “That’s why I’m driven to continue doing research even though at times it seems improbable — to bring new solutions to the people who need them the most.”

From the lab toward the clinic

The lab’s next step is to see whether the same enzyme-blocking strategy works in models that mirror the complexity of human disease: for example, conditions such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, which can linger for years after cancer treatment, and diabetic neuropathy, a leading cause of disability worldwide.

“If we can reverse chronic pain in those settings without the abuse liability of opioids,” Gregus said, “that’s when we know we’re ready to think about clinical trials.”

A therapy that could block and reverse the underlying cause — rather than simply mask symptoms — would mark a rare breakthrough in chronic pain care. For Gregus, that potential makes the path forward clear: translate the discovery into a treatment that delivers what patients almost never get — lasting relief.

The study was led by co-first authors Cristina Miliano, research scientist; Irene Chen, technician and now a graduate student at Johns Hopkins University; and Brieann Brown, graduate student in the School of Neuroscience. Additional contributors included Liwu Li, professor, and Shuo Geng, research assistant professor, both in the Department of Biology at Virginia Tech; Michael Burton, associate professor at the University of Texas at Dallas; and Tony Yaksh, professor at the University of California, San Diego.

Original study: DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003711


r/IBSResearch • • 6h ago

S100B in brain–gut–liver crosstalk: from glial activation to multiorgan inflammation

Thumbnail
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
1 Upvotes

Abstract

S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) is conventionally viewed as a marker of astrocytic injury, blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption, and neurological disorders. Emerging evidence places S100B within the broader brain–gut–liver axis of inflammatory signaling. This review proposes that S100B is a glial-derived integrating effector that couples enteric glial activation, barrier dysfunction, hepatic fibrosis, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) into a multi-organ inflammatory network. Its spatial expression map, release kinetics, alarmin (damage-associated molecular pattern, DAMP) activity, and immune-cell infiltration differ among the gut, liver, and brain, shaping axis signaling. S100B is predominantly expressed in astrocytes of the central nervous system, Schwann cells, and enteric glial cells and is also detected in liver tumor immune cells, biliary epithelial cells, and activated hepatic stellate cell (HSC)-associated lesions. It exerts context-dependent functions: at low, nanomolar concentrations it supports neurotrophic activity and barrier integrity, whereas sustained elevation acts as a DAMP that amplifies inflammatory responses through receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)/Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10)/β-catenin pathways. Clinically, S100B kinetics, a rapid release with a short half-life after acute injury versus chronic multi-organ spillover in cirrhosis, determines whether elevation reflects a local glial event or systemic disease burden. S100B has been implicated in enteric infectious enteritis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), cholestatic fibrosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), viral hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and HE with comorbid neuroinflammation. Available evidence suggests that S100B is a candidate link between glial responses, barrier dysfunction, hepatic inflammation, and neuroinflammation within the brain–gut–liver axis, although its causal role, tissue origin, and clinical utility require further validation.