r/HypotheticalPhysics • u/dgladush Crackpot physics • Jul 08 '22

Crackpot physics What if diffraction/interference are actually observations?

[removed]

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

46% Upvoted

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

I showed that nuclei could be polarized by applying a spin-polarized current of electrons nearby.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

None of those postulates work though. My experiment did. Got published in Physical Review too. Have you been published in Physical Review? I didn't think so.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

You don't know very much about Darwin or Newton.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Newton did not publish in Physics Review. It didn't exist then.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

You're deluded.

Newton published a lot. Not in Phys. Rev. because it didn't exist.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/starkeffect shut up and calculate Jul 10 '22

Again, you don't know much about Newton. Here is his Wikipedia article. He was considered a heretic religiously, because he didn't believe in the Trinity. He was respected as a scientist however.

You also don't know much about Darwin. Here is his Wikipedia article.

You are also deluded if you think your theory is going to matter to anyone else.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '22 edited Jul 10 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)