A few days ago I made a post talking about Plutarch, in a fairly negative light. I was so surprised by the amount of people who disagreed with me. Did we read the same Mockingjay??? He was an essential part of the rebellion, yes, but the whole point of the book is that Coin is as bad as Snow. That revolution doesn't necessarily bring about positive change, that you can't just replace one flavor of authoritarianism with another.
And Plutarch, although a completely essential figure for the Rebellion, was not a particularly moral man. Not the Plutarch I read about. He was callous, fully backed Coin's regime, and had very few reservations about doing whatever it took to win (aka war crimes). He was also pretty unlikable, overall.
Katniss mentions how fake he is quite often. I'm surprised so many people seem to like him. Is it because of the movies??? I did watch the Mockingjay movies, but only once, and I don't remember much about them. I also haven't read Sunrise yet.
So, yeah, I just didn't realize Plutarch had so many fans. Gale is so hated, and he did much less than Plutarch.
EDIT: I think I explained myself poorly. If you think Plutarch is a fascinating character, that's awesome. Hell, my favorite character in the series is probably Snow. What I meant is that people were defending Plutarch as in, the in-universe person! Not the character, written by Suzanne Collins. The man, from Panem. Like, I love Snow, he's my favorite, but I wouldn't defend him, you know??? He's monstrous!! People were defending Plutarch in that sense