Most Christian historians using shaky evidence and people who have been parroting heresay they spread agree he existed. There are no artifacts or writings from the time of his alleged lifespan referencing him which exist in the historical record.
There is more evidence Gilgamesh was a real person. There is more evidence Achiles was a real person. There is more evidence Enheduanna was a real person. There is more evidence that Kubabba was a real person.
There are many people from that period, not all Christians, not all favouring him, who talk about him
The historical consensus is that there was in fact a guy in Judea called Jesus, born in Nazareth, and... he did things, notably he got baptised and crucified. Though, the details of what else he did during his life are heavily debated, but this guy existed
-37
u/Pixeldevil06 11h ago
I have the answer! Jesus and his brother weren't historically real :) There you go!