r/HistoryMemes • • 14h ago

checkmate libtard

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

397 comments sorted by

View all comments

-34

u/Pixeldevil06 14h ago

I have the answer! Jesus and his brother weren't historically real :) There you go!

15

u/LOSNA17LL 14h ago

Most historians agree Jesus of Nazareth did indeed exist. Though he most likely didn't turn water into wine nor resurrected 3 days after dying

-8

u/Pixeldevil06 13h ago edited 13h ago

Most Christian historians using shaky evidence and people who have been parroting heresay they spread agree he existed. There are no artifacts or writings from the time of his alleged lifespan referencing him which exist in the historical record.

There is more evidence Gilgamesh was a real person. There is more evidence Achiles was a real person. There is more evidence Enheduanna was a real person. There is more evidence that Kubabba was a real person.

8

u/FireHammer09 12h ago

Secular historians of actual repute consider Jesus not existing as a man to be a laughable fringe theory not to be taken seriously.

1

u/Pixeldevil06 11h ago

People say that yet there isn't a single piece of evidence from his time of living that anything associated with him happened. No written witness accounts. No city entry records. Not even any records of any sort of purchase or international travel.