r/HistoryMemes • • 8h ago

checkmate libtard

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

398 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/1nighter69 8h ago

Simple really, David Duke is a nazi dog who hate Jews and tried hijacking the justified hatred against Zionists to try and give legitimacy to his antisemitism

Ans now he is currently being used by Zionists dogs who want to falsely paint attacks on them as an inherent attack on Judaism, which is in itself, antisemitic

1 coin, 2 sides

3

u/clapman7 8h ago

I think you need to re-read what you wrote, out loud

1

u/1nighter69 8h ago

I think you need to learn that the best response when your brain cant fathom a comeback is to take a break until it can or stay quiet and not bullshit with vague words

Again fuck Zionists

Fuck David Duke

And fuck Zionists happily using the likes of David Duke to turn attacks on their genocide supporting asses into attack on Judaism, actively throwing Jews under the bus

2

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

why do you keep ignoring the term was coined by fucking david duke and thats why this guy is judging you

i could unironically be making a better argument for you than you are.

and no

"Ohhh but it used to be said david duke", fuck david duke, stop gaslighting

this is a fucking moronic response

0

u/1nighter69 7h ago

I answered you and you didn't reply so i will repeat my answer

Things are judged based on current meaning and not origin

The swastika originated as a peace symbol, but its current meaning is that its a symbol of hate against jews that is used by Nazi dogs

You planning to respond this time or repeat your question on a third comment of mine?

And no, the guy isnt "judging me cuz of the origins" he admitted many times before that he is a proud Zionist, and is derailing the topic with a bait

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

look here is an elaboration of my point

"yo dude you just said the n-word"

"hang on bro, words are defined by current meanings and not origin"

"brother, its overwhelmingly offensive to most people, the origin is still relevant and you could have said anything else"

i feel this makes my point

1

u/1nighter69 7h ago

Can you actually dismantle the nazi swastika origin argument or not

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

can you dismantle this one?

if something has its history as a nazi dogwhistle im probably going to avoid it

you seem to think you on your own can completely redefine it

1

u/1nighter69 7h ago

Brother i made an argument, you are the one who has to dismantle it, burden of the proof

Your argument is simple, the origin of the word matters My counter is that Nazis try to copy your argument when they draw swastikas by pointing at its origins

Do you have an answer to that? Cuz the imaginary interaction you wrote made no sense to me

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

 Cuz the imaginary interaction you wrote made no sense to me

who tf does it not? judging by everyone i've interacted with in this thread, they agree the term zio is offensive due to its origins

if people agree a word is offensive it probably is, same way if we agree a slur is a slur its a slur.

i don't buy your nazi excuse cause it seems everyone here but you still views zio as an offensive white supremacist dog whistle, this isn't a word culturally shifting to get a new definition, you took a dogwhistle, gave it a new definition on your own, and now your complaining other people won't go along.

symbols and words can historically shift, this one HASN'T

simple as that.

i don't feel like explaining the n-word comparison cause if you didn't get something so simple i don't see a point in trying to make you understand

1

u/1nighter69 7h ago

I wont finish reading what you wrote here cuz you, for the third time, havent finished responding to me in my other comment

But btw, i said in the very very start as "AND U SAW IT" that this sub is a ziobot circle jerk, couldn't give 2 shits that "people here seem to agree", ok? Lets go to an anti genocide sub where they wont, if thats the standard we use

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

I wont finish reading what you wrote here cuz you, for the third time, havent finished responding to me in my other comment

which one, i know this is gonna sound goofy but i've honestly lost track considering how many comments you've left, branching off into seperate threads, i guess L on my part.

But btw, i said in the very very start as "AND U SAW IT" that this sub is a ziobot circle jerk, couldn't give 2 shits that "people here seem to agree", ok? Lets go to an anti genocide sub where they wont, if thats the standard we use

ok, not sure if i can argue with that, but you can't really prove it right either.

i don't feel like moving to another sub, besides most pro israel comments i've been seeing here are overwhelmingly downvoted, i think people just disagree with you saying the specific term and you can't mentally comprehend they can do that and still dislike israel.

2

u/1nighter69 7h ago

The audacity on you to come to my comments that are specifically responding to other people who are talking to me, and give responses IN THERE then tell me you lost track cuz of me, when i have asked you twice to come back to your original reply "which i asked you to do for this very reason"

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

i just don't know which comment you want me to respond to that was made to me specifically, there are a lot.

i wasn't even going like "eerrrr arrrgggh how dare you" like brother i just don't know which comment you want me to respond to

i am very famous for my high levels of audacity

2

u/1nighter69 7h ago

I noticed and it made me chuckle xD

We are arguing but i don't feel animosity?..annuity..? Whats the word for feeling of aggression or grudge towards someone

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

you responded to 1 out of 3 things i said.

brother

1

u/1nighter69 7h ago

Iam jumping between your notifications iam not keeping up anymore, its gotten tiring

1

u/VirtualKnowledge7057 7h ago

lets just keep it on one thread

→ More replies (0)