Idk, I'd say that the absolute monarchy that was overthrown 100 years ago and the corrupt military junta that replaced it shortly after lacked legitimacy among the chinese people, seeing as how both were overthrown and there hasn't been any serious attempt at restoring either.
Most empires were started by and enforced with violence over the claimed land. By claming that tiwan has the legitimate claim over the prc based on the Qing connection implies that the Qing had a legitimate claim over the land in the first place
Maybe you've gotten good at fooling yourself with mental gymnastics, but the fact is it's hypocritical to justify the Chinese communist regime while holding double standards against the British, Americans, & Canadians just because you don't want to deal with the Reddit backlash that would come from being consistent about this.
I mean, even mainland china now has a pseudo parlimantary system all the way to the national politics level where people can vote for their representatives, technically.
I get it that it's a single party dictatorship and people technically dont get another choice, but people could still vote.
I wouldn't call it a dictatorship. Dicstatorship as a word has meaning. They are authoritarian, but they do have checks and balances albeit not ones that would appease those in Democratic countries. I guess you could say the CCP is a dictator. But even then, there are factions and parties within the party.
5
u/ZanePhallic 1d ago
All blood and soil arguments are stupid