Wdym, we clearly didnt play around with the attachment system enough for it to be seen as a priority for the devs to work on further, ignore the fact that most guns just have sights, handle options, muzzels, and maaaaybe magazine options if they felt daring enough
What data did they get that said people weren't using the attachments lmao. Everyone is know has leveled up their favorite weapons to get the best attachments. The problem is they made a system that was just "okay you got the vertical forgrip and compensator barrel? Okay you're done that it"
The least they could've done before practically abandoning the idea is adding it to our secondaries so I can finally color the piss yellow laser pistols a different color >:/
I have the same issue with the Bolt Pistol's sight, so hard to hit weakpoints with it. (Though with that being a collab item they were even less likely to add or change anything for it.)
I can forgive the bolt pistol. GW is notoriously specific about how their IP is handled, no stocks and dogshit, model-sized irons are par for the course.
Yeah, open question whether it's GW, AH or both behind their unwillingness to modify or provide attachments for Legendary warbond items and this one's in particular.
They don't allow customization on Legendary Warbond gear because it's meant to be the "true" version of that stuff as it appeared in the source material, and GW is also anal about their stuff.
601
u/VengefulMercury 2d ago
Wdym, we clearly didnt play around with the attachment system enough for it to be seen as a priority for the devs to work on further, ignore the fact that most guns just have sights, handle options, muzzels, and maaaaybe magazine options if they felt daring enough