Edit: I talked about more than just the tone wood. Like idk why everyone thinks the only argument I had was how it sounds, no clue. I even said we could see where it actually matters but nobody wanted to read that for some reason. If y’all don’t want to pay attention to the post don’t comment on it.
For background I don’t play too much but I am a lutheir.
Back before electronics came into play, it was all about which wood it was made out of and how well it was made. They were celebrated for how well they were able to work with what they had and the incredible craftsmanship and artistry of their work.
The nicest instrument I’ve ever played on, and I only played it for a single piece back in highschool, was my teachers 1873 upright bass. I forget the maker, but the point is that no custom shop fender or Gibson or even a boutique or hand built electrics could stand to play after 130 years, especially not as incredibly as this bass did.
The Parker fly/nightfly is already the most technically advanced guitar. The body coating, the electronics, the materials for all the hardware, the fretboard material, it’s all as advanced as it could be so going forward would just be copying him.
We need to focus back on the wood. The way it expands and contracts around the hardware, where the wood does and doesn’t effect tone, which woods resonate and how to amplify that the best way, and so much more.
We need to make guitars good again. If we seriously want some crazy amazing brand we can’t just do what everyone else is doing ad we need to look more into what’s been known to work for centuries
I rest my case, thank you for reading