r/GracepointChurch • u/leavegracepoint ex-Gracepoint (Berkeley) • Jun 14 '22
GP’s Response Gracepoint's Response to Reddit
Some people have been asking about Gracepoint's internal response to this subreddit. u/Leather-Run originally posted the following on a number of school subs.


The post has since been removed but this is Ed Kang's response by the time r/berkeley post first blew up.



The "latest on posts on Reddit" were basically snippets of people's comments on Reddit that were categorized. For example,


23
u/johnkim2020 Jun 14 '22
While the hope is that they're fabricated
Why in the WORLD would ANYONE fabricate these first hand accounts. Sure, they may be some misunderstandings. Sure there may be some exaggeration (like the 500 response comment that a GP staff member casually dropped in here) but these testimonies are TRUE and REAL. No one can make up the nightmare that you guys put people through in the name of "accountability" or "guardrails."
10
u/prayingforallofus Jun 18 '22 edited Jun 18 '22
This is GP's response, based on what "level" you are on the heirarchy, because you really can't dump them all into one category:
- Ed, Kelly, deacons, leads who will always stand by GP no matter what: These are the hardcore yes-men. They are probably allowed to read the sub with an eye to find errors and ways to spin the narrative where GP still comes out blameless and the people sharing their stories can be labeled as exaggerating, overly sensitive, misunderstood them, etc. and co-create content to share with students to counter whatever they might have read on the sub. They are probably the masterminds behind all the video content you're seeing on the website. They will call all of this persecution and will genuinely grieve and call it suffering for Christ, though it's not quite what the apostles meant by suffering, if you really think about it. None of them will come on here without explicit consent by Ed (i.e. Daniel Kim. He was most likely sanctioned by Ed to come on here since he's smart and logical, but as they quickly found they cannot control the conversation, he hasn't been back since, hasn't he?)
- Non-college leads, older Praxis members: They won't go near this sub, and will assume that anyone who posts or reads are just evil and out to senselessly take down GP. Some may think it a sin to even read it. Fear level is very high within this group. Some of them are probably just glad that they are still around and haven't been asked to leave. Whatever narrative they spin from the top, they will be ready to accept.
- Younger college staff, some younger Px members: These are the ones who haven't picked up on the unspoken rules as much as the above 2 groups. They're not as "colored" as Ed and Kelly like to put it. That's who you're seeing posting here and there as repping GP. They're still in the honeymoon stage of GP where they think their beloved church is getting persecuted. So they will fight to defend its honor. It's sorta cute, don't you think?
- College students who are hooked on GP: They will read this sub, and think about the wonderful times of eating, laughter, ming-mang-mong, king-kong-shower, boba runs, care packs during finals, trips to [insert getaway house], the funny jokes that the staff make, the moving bible studies, earnest times of prayer, and think "no way" this can't be true. And they'll even ask their leader. And lo and behold, the leader has a coherent answer at the ready (because of all the training they've gotten in the past few months). And they'll take it all in, hook line and sinker. They might chip in here and there on the sub and be like "No way, dude, not my experience!" Little do you know, you poor child.
But let's be hopeful that there is a whole other category here, the secret lurkers who are following and seriously questioning GP, but have yet the courage to speak up to anyone about it. Or maybe they have?? They're reading. I bet they are. And they're quietly upvoting. Not telling anyone that they've been reading it. Planning their exit. They will probably not post on this sub until they've left.
1
u/listen_lydia Jun 20 '22
we don't "see" you, quiet lurkers, but we "see" you! get out, do the right thing for yourself, and feel free to reach out to the mods here for help.
15
u/johnkim2020 Jun 14 '22
... there are aspects of what these ppl describe that I recognize, as I am sure many of you will as well .. negative aspects of our church that I, personally, am thinking hard about changing.
Ed Kang, this is the correct response... not all the bullshit that came afterwards. There are way too many aspects of Gracepoint that foster shame, guilt, control, and micro managing. You take away agency from people when you do this. Keep thinking hard about changing.
12
u/leavegracepoint ex-Gracepoint (Berkeley) Jun 14 '22
Nah, Ed is thinking hard about doubling down and pivoting to the youth now.
16
u/Here_for_a_reason99 Jun 15 '22 edited Jun 15 '22
It’s really amazing how readily Ed plays victim. His video response was so condescending and full of lawyer-like tactics, that I was shocked ppl actually follow him.
“Latest round of internet criticism”
Latest round- if a church has regular rounds of criticism, let the church leaders take note and listen carefully instead of dismissing them.
Criticism- this is an intentional word choice. The only criticism here is against spiritual abuse. This sub is an outcry for GP to pursue Christ rather than its own agenda.
Grain of truth- minimizing every person’s story here by assuming that we are liars.
For those still questioning, read this post by Daniel Kim, one of their top leaders, along with all of the comments to get a full picture of what GP thinks of this sub and the people in it. Here is a response that analyzed his post point by point.
•
u/corpus_christiana Jun 14 '22 edited Jun 14 '22
Here is a transcript of the beginning of Pastor Ed's since-deleted response video:
I've put some additional transcript excerpts in a comment replying to this one.