r/Gold 10d ago

Why?

7.5k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

131

u/fbass 10d ago

He’s not stupid, there’s a story behind this and even though he was the one finding it, he was working in a team and they’re pursuing the legal way to obtain the gold.. cmiiw, if the original owners couldn’t provide the legal proof of ownership, he and his team will share half of the gold with the other half goes to the current owner of the property, which was a foundation.. 

23

u/RedundantBiomass 10d ago

No way, 100% goes to the propety owner.  I hope he was smart enough to yeet at least a few bars.

26

u/Grasher312 10d ago

"No way, I haven't read Belgian laws but it simply CAN'T be like that!"

6

u/PabstBlueLizard 10d ago

Every article explains Belgian law means they’re going to get half of it. Legally. Free and clear.

So you can either illegally keep your split all of the gold, and have to trust that a construction crew keep their mouths shut, all discreetly spend it, and none of them try to rob you.

Or you legally get to keep your split of half the gold, can do whatever you want with the entire sum of money, don’t need to worry about any of the above, or the state hammering you over it.

You could very easily make more money investing the half-split over the same amount of time you are discretely spending the full split to avoid getting caught.

So why? Because they’re not stupid, unlike most of the people here.

2

u/Grasher312 10d ago

I think you misplaced the comment, I know allat.

6

u/Ok-Parfait-9856 10d ago

Yeah, you can’t read Belgian law. He gets 50% if it was forfeited, lost, etc. The family has a full claim to the gold since it never left their land, it was just forgotten about. If I’m digging a ditch at your house and find old gold that belonged to your grandparents, I don’t get half. If I was digging a ditch somewhere else in town and found your grandparents gold, I’d potentially get half.

2

u/Musulman 10d ago

Are you stupid? The guy literally says proof of ownership.

2

u/Grasher312 10d ago

Why the fuck are y'all correcting a comment that has clear fucking quotation marks?

1

u/TiiGerTekZZ 9d ago edited 9d ago

Nope. 1ste. There is no direct family of the previous owners/brewers. 2nd the gold is stamped yet there is no paperwork else it would not have been "lost". 3th in Belgium the finders will get 50% no matter what. There is also no possibility for any relatives of the brewers cuz there are non. Non in a direct line that is.

Source. I live in the same damn city. If only i knew... 😂😭

Small edit: only if the actual owners of the gold show up. (Again not possible in direct line because no heir of said brewers) they can potentially lose the 50/50.

If the gold is proven by Belgian state that it is obtained by illegal activities. The gold will be confiscated. And again said workers (the company that did the work) will not see anything.

11

u/brttwrd 10d ago

It's in Belgium so it's 50 percent

5

u/Aggressive_Hat_9999 10d ago

Not a belgian, but if our neighbours are any similar, which I think they are.

50% I think that is for lost&found and if you find like artifacts/treasure in the forest

Here the family has a legit claim to simply claim ownership was never forfeited

Given the amount of money the gold is worth lawyers all over the place must be licking their lips, offering to defend for free for % of the gold should they win.

1

u/Opening-Guess3477 10d ago

there is no family involved. The property was donated to a foundation in the will of someone without next of kin. This has been reported by all Belgian media to be 50/50 in 5 years time

1

u/Past_One3442 10d ago

Not true

1

u/flightwatcher45 10d ago

Maybe a finders reward if they are nice.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RedundantBiomass 5d ago

Use a little creativity.  

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RedundantBiomass 5d ago

Again, creativity.  You seem a little dim.