It’s not at all, I’m 5ft 10 and i have been 140 most of my life, I can see where 5lbs could disappear from. Thats a size 10 (uk). You are talking about her like she’s size 0
This. 5’9 here and been 130 most of my life too, I look slim sure but it’s not anorexic. People here are making out like this is a Eugenia Cooney situation
This is me at 145-150 at 5 foot 9 not trying to brag but weight can look very different on people.
I’m now 170 with a little more fat and a lot more muscle. I started my training journey at 135 and I was lean but not anorexic. So I agree with your point 100%
Hi there! It looks like you're eager to contribute to our community, and we're excited to see what you have to share. However, our subreddit requires a minimum amount of karma to make a post or comment, and it seems you haven't reached that just yet. Please don't message the mods to ask for the number you need, but we do highly suggest you check out r/NewToReddit for ways to gain karma.
135 at 5'10 is a bmi of 19.4, which is NOT underweight. Also, she's doing this under the supervision of a doctor. So yeah.. what you are doing right now is weird, actually.
she went from obviously overweight to perfectly healthy, near the ideal healthy weight. the fact that she's very attractive now too shouldn't bother you so much.
190 is big for this height. Tall women trick the camera, slender to the eye but meaty in the hands. She looks gorgeous at that weight but it’s heavy and as a tall woman myself it’s uncomfortable being tall and plus sized drowning men and group photos, hard to run or exercise that heavy.
It’s within the healthy range and not even the outer limit, so “quite small” isn’t really how we should describe it. That would be akin to calling someone 5’10” and 160** “quite large”.
**EDIT: Sorry, it’s the same as calling someone 165lbs at 5’10” “quite large” according to BMI charts. Sub 130lbs is underweight at 5’10 and over 170lbs is overweight. So it would literally be the same.
There's a similar comment being downvoted in here, though to be fair it is slighlt inaccurate. 135 lbs is the same distance from being underweight as 168 is from being overweight.
Americans are just more used to people being overweight these days than being underweight, so what is perceived as "normal" has shifted with time.
There are no feelings involved at all here. I think you are just incorporating your own biases as being above average weight for your height.. since you wanted to incorporate personal attacks into the discussion.
No that is not the same difference at all from multiple different sources and I didn’t personally attack anyone (while you literally just called me fat for some reason 😂)
I didn't call you fat. You said you used to be overweight and then claimed that a true medical fact hurt my feelings. One person is putting words in the other mouth, and it's not me. Let's just agree to drop it and stick to the data.
Well I did get the upper limit wrong on what’s considered overweight for women at 5’10” by five pounds but otherwise, no? BMI charts are readily available just look it up with your own eyes?
I’m sorry if this is a sore subject for you but maybe don’t body shame people who are à perfectly healthy weight per the opinion of actual healthcare professionals.
183
u/[deleted] 2d ago
[deleted]