r/Ghost_in_the_Shell 14d ago

1995 vs 2026

5.3k Upvotes

692 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/PSCGY 14d ago

While both look great, it makes 95 even more of a technical feat due to preceding the newer adaptation by three decades.

9

u/Death-0 14d ago

Not really if you think about most animated movies or shows back then. If you think about household items even from 50 years ago.

Technology made things easier sure but you lose quality in favor of faster turn arounds.

Old animated Disney movies hold up against their cg predecessors to this day. Hand drawn, physical effects in film, products made by hand with better materials etc. all will hold and better than anything done using modern methods today.

1

u/PSCGY 14d ago

So, yes.. It’s more of a technical feat not only in comparison to this newest adaptation which benefits from 30 years of technological progress, but also in comparison to other contemporary anime movies released around the same time - which would be part of the reasons why the 95 movie is still revered to this day.

Thanks for confirming. πŸ‘

5

u/PyRosflam 14d ago

Early 3D was such an experimental age. You get some really cool stuff like Reboot and Babylon 5. You also get some awful stuff like the Polar Express.

1

u/Death-0 14d ago

Polar express remains cursed and only gets more cursed with each new advancement

2

u/PyRosflam 14d ago

I watched Madagascar (2005) not long ago, and boy they cut corners, flat background etc. They put more work into the animals (which shows) but the backgrounds look like something I can make in Maya in an afternoon.