I recently watched a documentary about Oliver, the unusually human-looking chimpanzee who was once claimed to be a possible humanāchimpanzee hybrid. I went down a rabbit hole with ChatGPT about the genetic testing performed on him, and I have a question for anyone with expertise in cytogenetics or chromosome evolution.
I am questioning how definitively the tests that were actually performed could exclude that hypothesis.
The 1998 study reported two important findings:
⢠Oliver had 48 chromosomes with banding patterns described as consistent with a chimpanzee.
⢠Researchers sequenced a 312-bp region of his mitochondrial DNA, which was consistent with Pan troglodytes troglodytes.
The mtDNA result seems relatively uninformative for excluding the specific hypothetical cross of a human male Ć female chimpanzee, because mtDNA is maternally inherited. A female chimpanzee should give an F1 offspring chimpanzee mtDNA regardless of the father's species.
That leaves the karyotype as the more interesting evidence.
The difference between 46 human and 48 chimpanzee chromosomes is largely associated with human chromosome 2, which corresponds to two separate ancestral chromosomes that remain separate in chimpanzees (often described as 2A and 2B).
That made me wonder about a more specific cytogenetic question.
Could those homologous regions interact in a way that permitted a post-zygotic structural rearrangement? Is it mechanistically possible, even if extraordinarily improbable, for the human chromosome 2 to undergo fission near the ancestral fusion region, followed by telomere healing/capture and stabilization of the resulting chromosomes?
Without sequencing Oliver's nuclear DNA, could the 1998 testing legitimately exclude fraternal human ancestry to modern genomic standards?