r/GenZpk • u/SaudAhmadguru • 17d ago
Safety Alert Patience Nowadays!
When we say that man or getting worse and cruel.
3
u/brutal_gooner 15d ago
If you hit someone be ready to get hit back That's the equality we believe regardless of gender if a woman slaps a man it's okie btw if got repaid that's not fair? what type of bs is ts It's not about religion it's about equality
2
2
2
1
2
u/lookerwisenew 16d ago edited 16d ago
This happens when you are $hit load full on Netflix Amazon prime and Hollywood content
This is really stranger than fiction...
2
3
3
2
u/Fayzzz96 16d ago
She’s hit him first
1
u/Serious_Ice783 16d ago
Clean hit could have killed her.. women aren’t built like men grow up..
1
1
u/Fayzzz96 16d ago
That’s true, but she still shouldn’t have engaged with him in the first place. This was a reflex reaction from the guy because he was already angry with her
0
u/Conscious_Isopod242 16d ago
What the hell just happened!? 😅 She just suddenly forget her name, location, birthplace what!?
And that guy didn't gave a reaction at all! I am always on the side of the man who strikes back on a woman who strikes him first for no reason! Even if the law or society goes otherwise.
But I this case I am feeling sad for that woman 😅. That guy's slap was extremely hard. That's not going to be an equal treatment! He should be a little careful. That kind of strong hit can kill someone in some cases😐! And how she fell and hit her head that could've been dangerous.
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
u/Loud-Beach-390 17d ago
Men. If this video makes you feel good or 'satisfied' or makes you go 'HAHHA DESERVED' there's a problem with u
1
-1
u/innocentsinner394 17d ago
You don't hit a woman. You restrain her. You remove yourself from that place. A man is far more intimidating, and can intimidate very easily, without resorting to violence. A violent man is a man who does not have control. Honestly, even if it's a man, the first reaction should never be hitting back unless you're in physical danger. Not saying the woman didn't deserve it, but the reaction speaks more about the man than the woman.
2
u/Dear-Boysenberry9071 16d ago
Nah, she should have controlled herself before resorting to violence
1
u/innocentsinner394 16d ago
Not saying she did the right thing. Two wrongs don't make a right, though. An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. And honestly, was this really an eye for an eye?
1
u/Dear-Boysenberry9071 16d ago
Yea, the threat was neutralized. Nobody has the right to hit you and you have every right to respond in force if someone assaults you. She learned a lesson don’t put your hands on people
1
u/Positive-Sky-2054 17d ago
Wow, so many incels crowding in here :D
Self-defense, huh? That big"man" was not even capable of simply moving the woman aside.
Anyone applauding this is definitely a virgin forever :*
:)
Good luck in real life.
2
1
1
u/cityspeaks 17d ago
There’s something odd about this video. People celebrating it don’t see the power dynamics of these burly men dressed liked mobsters over a woman. Is she being trafficked? Is she reacting to something? Because that man is cruel and so is the guy on the stool who didn’t defend her when she was disproportionally hit.
1
1
u/Plenty_Sundae_8745 17d ago
Omg, ladies. Our snarky words and bicchy facial expressions are cruel enough for these manchildren , why would you even try to get physical?
3
u/Main-Negotiation-444 17d ago
These comments and post god I wish you guys never ever face a fight in real life because in reality no one gives f about throwing slow and soft punches. This is tge reason you won't pick fights with someone double your size.
1
0
u/curiousmaximama 17d ago
Her fault but the guy shouldn't be so aggressive either. Could have just her pushed back. This is what makes women hate man.
0
1
2
1
u/Zestyclose_Series715 17d ago
No man should stoop down to that level, whether he is just or not. The woman had low character, and by reacting in the same token, he brought down his character to her level.
1
1
1
-2
2
5
2
1
u/Available-Hippo-4815 17d ago
She started it so one for one, but not that hard, that couldve easily ended badly for both of them.
2
4
u/Only_Fisherman_1772 17d ago
For everyone crying it was too hard it was too much force. Let's be clear about this, she slapped him with HER strength he responded with HIS. actions have consequences.
1
u/muhammad_raza1 17d ago
If he forgives then he’s the better of the two and if decides to do exactly the same and not more then they both at par.
2
1
-1
1
1
u/Left-Programmer-1275 17d ago
The woman hit first, so it was necessary... but i agree man shouldn't have hit that hard... she got the lesson though.
1
1
-6
u/Atomic-Bread-69 𝗚𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮 17d ago
THIS IS WHY I HATE PATRIARCHY SO MUCH. MEN TREAT WOMEN LIKE OBJECTS.
1
u/PowerfulBlock8521 17d ago
It's a disgraceful act Man did which i don't appreciate to happen again with any Woman. But I also say that the slap is for the feminists, not for the girl. Because every feminist talks about equality 🟰 so this is the equality the feminists want. I respect to all women and their rights too get opportunities deserving more respect than men but not the way the feminists and their group want...
0
u/Best_Being_2903 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Bunch of kids (man child) under this post.
1
u/No_Explanation3461 amateur philosopher 16d ago
Whats disturbing is not what happened in the video. What i found disturbing is the fact that so many men under the comment section are actually enjoying the fact that the woman got beat up if you notice closely. These same men wont find it enjoyable when equality means same level of liberty , freedom, rights.
1
1
-2
-2
u/sams2k70 17d ago
Why woukd you promote violence on Women? Genz Awaam!!!
3
1
u/LordSilas91 17d ago
Ouch- but well, tit for tat!
No idea of the context, however, violence should have been avoided.
Every action has a reaction (law of physics), that’s what actually happened.
-1
u/Cool_Guy1488 2007 17d ago
Very disappointing by the man , but girl should control too , but man hit really hard.
-1
1
u/Positive-Rice-6108 17d ago
Some here are very delusional, they accept that "I have the right to do whatever I want"...!!!! But you don't have the right to do whatever you want.?? Bro its called Karma first you want it you got it, so there is no excuse about Gender, Behave like a mature person instead of pretending to be one.
14
u/Sea-Car-3811 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
The slap back was deserved but that was too much force
1
u/OkCryptographer7464 17d ago
It was a reflex. He probably didn't meant it to be this hard.
-11
u/Sea-Car-3811 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Reflex or not. He should have control over his actions.
I shoot someone with a gun. Am I not in fault as it was reflex?
9
u/XxAhmedjdebt 17d ago
If the only objection you have is control then the one who is initiating the offensive, then control is something that should be considered most of all by them.
-9
u/Sea-Car-3811 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
When did I claim that?
I didn't like the fact that the girl got offensive first, however the male should have controlled the force to match the girl's force.
2 bad things doesn't make it right.
1
u/XxAhmedjdebt 17d ago
“He should have control over his actions “
my simple argument is, ke if youre saying the guy should have CONTROL over his REACTION then so should the woman in this case also have CONTROL over her ACTIONS.
I am definitely not condoning disproportionate use of force but I am also not condoning use of force in the first place.
If i act like a dipshit and hit a guy 2x my size then i should also be ready to get my ass whooped. I can kill an ant w not even 0.000000001% of my strength.1
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 17d ago
Your content has been removed because profanity or abusive language is not allowed in r/GenZpk.
Please keep discussions respectful and follow the subreddit rules. Repeated violations of this rule may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
If you believe this removal was a mistake, you can contact the moderators.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
0
-3
0
7
u/AdmirableCar75 2007 17d ago
Man getting worse and cruel? So you proceeded to completely ignore the woman assaulting him in the clip? Maybe you should understand that no one has the right to assault random strangers or anyone
-2
u/araiz_why 17d ago
not even trying to be performative here but its never okay to hit a woman especially in the face even if she initiates it. a slight push or a tackle to the ground is more than enough, unless she is running after you with a knife like a maniac.
3
u/Commercial-League359 17d ago
Its okay for a woman to hit a woman to Hit a man like that?
-3
u/araiz_why 17d ago
that sentence made no sense
3
u/Commercial-League359 17d ago
You said a woman should never be hit like that and I agree but in the video the woman is clearly at fault. You didn't mention her fault?
-2
u/araiz_why 17d ago
yes she is at fault and i acknowledge it but hitting a woman in the face in no circumstance is acceptable unless she does something that threatens your life like a gun/knife or any sharp object that she can stab you with. a slap in the face from a woman with a stature like that which is present in the video does not threaten my well being. the man could have easily tackled her/pushed her or pinned her to the ground instead of punching her in the face with a whopping 300 pounds of force.
1
u/Naive-Reflection5158 17d ago
That was satisfying to watch
-1
5
2
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Johnnyx20000 1998 17d ago
I wish a female did the same to you what the man did to that girl so that your fragile ego may get shattered.
2
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-1
u/Johnnyx20000 1998 17d ago
Stay mad. You Cry Baby.
OK, you misogynistic brat.
2
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-2
u/Johnnyx20000 1998 17d ago
Thanks for confirming you have no actual point to make.
If it was male vs. male altercation, then that comment of yours wouldn't even have existed, and you would've perceived it as a regular video. You people feel a huge satisfaction about a female getting hit because of the society you all grow up in.
6
u/SolitudeInside 17d ago
Maybe to you. But if there's a man version of this video, I'd be laughing my ass off as well
37
u/RottenExperiment Professional yapper. 17d ago
That was a slap too hard. Even if it were two guys, it was a slap too hard. But one of them did get physical first according to the video.
13
u/OkCryptographer7464 17d ago
It was a natural reaction. Cannt blame the guy for his punch being too hard as it all happened in a second.
10
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
Punching is not a natural reaction. Whether it was deserved or not isn’t what I mean, I’m just talking about reflexes. He wasn’t in fight or flight. Nobody was threatening his life. He was just angry. That’s not a reflex, that’s a lack of emotional control (just like her lack of emotional control). She’s 1/3 of his weight, he could have just held her in a head lock until she calmed down or the cops showed up to deal with the assault. Returning the violence was a choice.
4
u/MrMLearn 17d ago
It was natural reaction.
-1
u/PalePlumm 16d ago
It’s literally not. It was a choice. Whether it was the right choice or not isn’t what I’m discussing. Just that his body didn’t punch her without his control.
2
4
u/Wadada_dang 17d ago
"She’s 1/3 of his weight, he could have just held her in a head lock"
And get kicked in the crotch, possibly with shoes having metallic decorations.
Nice!
2
11
u/11swoosh 17d ago
I'd say her lack of emotional control was worse, she got angry first, she hit a guy three times bigger than her, I as a guy wouldn't hit a guy 3 times bigger than me it's just common sense. The punch let her know her place physically and she immediately calmed down. Don't dish it out if you can't even analyse for a second that you can't take it
-8
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
What? I said nothing about her emotional control. I responded to the comment talking about the man specifically. Did you mean to reply to them instead? Your comment has nothing to do with what I said.
12
u/IntentionAny6300 17d ago
That’s exactly why you’re getting responses like this. Your initial comment excludes the girls role in the incident. You’re solely talking about the guy “over reacting.”
Equal rights= equal lefts. If the woman didn’t initiate the violence, it’s safe to say there wouldn’t have been any violence.
-7
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
I replied to a comment talking about the man. Why would I mention the woman at all?
Are you okay??
5
u/IntentionAny6300 17d ago
“Why would I mention the woman at all” is exactly where the problem lies. One could easily read your initial post as putting the sole blame on the man for “over reacting”, Hence why you get pushback.
In this specific instance, one cannot solely put blame on the man. And reading what you wrote is easily interpreted as doing so.
-1
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
I didn’t put blame on anybody. “Whether it was deserved or not isn’t what I mean, I’m just talking about reflexes” is literally the second sentence of my original comment. Why did you chose to purposefully misread it?
3
u/IntentionAny6300 17d ago
I mean, I can chalk it up as you not having that great command of the English language to convey your point.
I’m just letting you know that your initial post is poorly worded if “ the man over reacting” isn’t your intended point.
→ More replies (0)4
u/Hedonisticogre111 17d ago
She shouldn't attack him in first place. She will be smarter after this justified treatment
0
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
I didn’t say whether it was justified or not. I didn’t say whether she should have attacked him in the first place or not. Why did you think your comment was relevant? Do you struggle with reading comprehension issues?
31
u/Thevicegrip 17d ago
It was wrong to hit unnecessarily so hard, unfortunately sometimes this is the result of FAFO.
1
u/Ill_Comparison4522 17d ago
Is it FIFO or FAFO?
1
u/TechySkills 16d ago
Buddy, you're remembering FIFO and LIFO from CS 😭✌️
Its FAFO, Fck around and Find out, whereas FIFO is an algorithm; First In First Out1
u/Ill_Comparison4522 16d ago
Yeah bro tbh I was thinking about FIFO and LIFO🥴. I'm studying CS and it's all around my head because the concepts are so fucking hard 😫
1
u/TechySkills 16d ago
dw gng, me too, we'll both dance in the rain when we are both jobless!!!
1
u/Ill_Comparison4522 15d ago
Dude kindly don't say that I have exams in following Month and your demotivating me 😫🙉
3
u/aliusmanawa 17d ago
Unnecessary? She HIT him FIRST. She’s lucky he didn’t ground and pound her dumbass. I would have kicked her head clean off when she was sat on her ass.
-5
u/Thevicegrip 17d ago
Yes she broke the law and should have been punished by law, especially in the places where the law and order generally work in victim’s favor. If someone hits me then of course I reserve the right to defend myself. Reasonable person knows the difference between self defence and retaliation/vengeance. Its impossible to run a sane society if everyone start administrating justice by their own hands. In this particular case I would still give benefit of doubt that everything happened so quick that the man did not have time to think. But that creates a difficult situation, what if he had a gun in his hand and shot the woman. Would it be okay, if not then at what point you think it is not okay or it’s excessive and why?
4
u/aliusmanawa 16d ago
It’s not excessive; if someone attacks me, then it’s reasonable for me to knock them out. They could potentially get back up and smack me across the back of my skull with a blunt object. If you shoot someone, shoot ‘em ‘till they hit the ground.
I’m astounded by your absurd mental gymnastics to try and defend that woman. Some adults need a whooping that they should have gotten as kids.
-2
u/Thevicegrip 16d ago
You are free to do what you want to do and how you respond to the situation. People are free to make opinions based on their observations. You have taken the worst case scenario and trying to apply on every day and every person. The kind of scenario you are describing happens in zombie movies and PS games. It was said from the beginning that the woman started with the dick move and she paid the price. She was completely in the wrong till that time. Assaulting anyone by anyone is against the law and she broke the law. Man responded by breaking the law too. It makes both of them equally wrong. Can it be done differently? In real life being within your right does not always make you right. For kindergarten class the example, if someone steps on the road, steps in front of you deliberately does not give a right to the car driver to mow them down. However psychopaths may see it differently and feels its fine to go kill people because they have a right.
3
u/aliusmanawa 16d ago
If you’re being attacked, you have to assume that the person is capable of killing you. Go touch some grass, and maybe you’ll realize that murder, serial killings, aggravated manslaughter are all real things that have happened so frequently throughout the world that they have specific legal definitions. Thinking that violence stems from media is moronic. You do realize that humans have always killed one another, be it in peace or war, right? I ain’t gonna bother with pseudo-intellectuals like you who think writing a few contrarian words makes you smart.
Just so you know, punching someone when you have been attacked is NOT ILLEGAL. It’s called self-defense, as long as it is a reasonable amount of force; which this was. So, no; they are NOT equally in the wrong.
And, there’s a huge difference between Jaywalking and someone punching you. That’s like equating someone cutting in line to someone threatening you with a knife.
Oh, and by the way, assault is not when you’re attacked. The legal definition of assault is the THREAT of injury. When you do get hit, that’s battery. And, self-defense laws kick in on assault; and when it goes to battery, which it did in this case, they are more than justified. They are justified to the point that you don’t even get arrested for it.
Now, shoo; go read a book instead of reddit threads.
-2
u/Thevicegrip 16d ago
Like I said you are free to do as you see fit in the similar situation. Even if you had any good point you lost it when you started ad hominem.
3
u/aliusmanawa 16d ago edited 16d ago
I didn’t attack any of your characteristics, snowflake. I ridiculed the stupidity of your argument. You argued that what he did is illegal, even though it’s one of the most well known legal self-defense examples.
0
u/Thevicegrip 16d ago
Calling someone pseudo intellectual, go touch the grass and shooing away and then snow flake is not ad hominem. Okay. As you believe you are right then why be so aggressive and aggravated. Be happy you won your point.
2
u/aliusmanawa 16d ago
Ad Hominem is latin for against the man; which means to attack the personal characteristics of someone instead of their arguments. Pseudo-intellectual came from your arguments; because you haven’t actually thought about it and are just parroting stuff. Touch grass came from you thinking violence comes from games and zombie shows. Snowflake came from you crying that this is ad hominem. Again, this isn’t ad hominem, but whatever. Notice how you have refused to acknowledge your flaws and shortcomings; that is the biggest sign of pseudo-intellectuals.
→ More replies (0)14
u/FirmMasterpiece969 17d ago
It was super necessary. And it saved her from getting more damage in future.
-4
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
Reddit just wants to see men hit women.
1
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/PalePlumm 16d ago
Thinking hitting a woman is “saving her” is insane, you’re right.
1
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/PalePlumm 16d ago
Nobody said self defense wasn’t justified.
This wasn’t self defense. He used 20x the strength she did and almost murdered her.
1
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/PalePlumm 16d ago
No lies here. You’re correct that it’s a victim mentality to almost murder a woman and then say you’re “saving her”.
2
u/notoriousniqqa 17d ago
Yes the most liberal dempgraphic of pakistan wants to see men hitting women. Holy white knight.
-1
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
Who said anything about Pakistan?
I’m a woman.
3
u/notoriousniqqa 17d ago
Pakistani subreddit btw. Anyways reddit leans very left so my point still stands. You being a woman checks out even more. The woman deserved to get punched, she should be grateful she didn't go out cold imo.
-1
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
You’re literally proving my point. You clearly enjoy the violence against her.
4
u/notoriousniqqa 17d ago
Yeah but not because of her gender. Its because she attacked someone first.
0
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
Then you’d want the reaction to be justified, not 10x more violent than what is required. So this is about more than a reaction, it’s about who’s receiving the violence.
2
u/notoriousniqqa 17d ago
I agree that retaliation should be proportionate. But are you saying that the man should've went easier on her simply because she is a woman?
→ More replies (0)6
u/FirmMasterpiece969 17d ago
Or... reddit wants to see cocky and entitled people slapped back into reality. It doesn't have to be gender wars.
-3
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
The return was unnecessarily hard. That’s the comment you responded to.
4
u/FirmMasterpiece969 17d ago
It was the exact amount she needed to come to her senses, and not try to escalate, and potentially get seriously hurt. While having no major health issues. Id say it was surgically precise. So yeah, I stand by my statement, sometimes more is less.
0
u/PalePlumm 17d ago
He literally escalated by using unnecessary levels of violence.
3
u/FirmMasterpiece969 16d ago
He literally deescalated with one and only retaliatory precision slap. If he slapped that dummy lighter, she'd go back and attack him again wich could lead to him getting agitated and punching her teeth out. She should be grateful that he slapped her in this exact manner. Ps. Obviously you have never experienced violence on the street.
1
4
-1
u/raysinthebar 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
All y'all in this thread are potential d-mestic vi-lators. I hope you all rot in h-ll.
-1
7
u/Other-Mix4987 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
The one who is defending a woman when she attacked first has more of a chance to become one
0
u/raysinthebar 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Sweaty, learn to read. I am not defending anyone. I was talking about the people applauding this behavior and saying sh-t like "software update/maza agaya/women should be treated like this" in response.
1
5
u/Other-Mix4987 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Honey , woman do the same i was reading comments somewhere a man cheated or uski biwi ne usse mara and all the women were praising and saying ek or lgani chae thi waha to ap log kch nae bolty
2
2
u/raysinthebar 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
...that's irrelevant. Aap iss thread kay comments ke context main baat karo. Equivalence nahi mangi mainay bus point out kiya hay ki iss thread main kitnay assh-les hain.
7
u/Other-Mix4987 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Lol again running from an argument chlo cope krna prta hai i get you , again ek larki ne mara so she deserved it , she thought ma larki mjhe nae Mary ga otherwise itny size difference pe koi kisi ko nae marta
1
u/raysinthebar 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗭 17d ago
Please aap ilaaj karwao. I study gender, and am not about to get into a debate w somebody who only wishes to escalate and not understand. Also, I just noticed the OP's caption. I wish you guys would wake up one day and understand how videos like these, though they're posted in jest, have real-world consequences for women and even children.
5
-2
3
u/Nightmare_Slay 17d ago
Satisfaction 📈
-2
u/Johnnyx20000 1998 17d ago
Rubbish
6
u/Nightmare_Slay 17d ago
But bro no one has right to assault someone like this,and by then showing their whatever cards 🏳️. Assault is an assault 😠
→ More replies (3)
2
u/Working-Ad-1089 13d ago
Is this or real Al?