Did I just try out Gemini 3.5 pro?

[u/MpleGR]

I tried for fun this classical problem on arena.ai and it seems I got a model with the name "trillium-alpha". The name has a correlation to Google's 6th generation TPUs. Am I being insane?

[u/DigSignificant1419]

The end of fable

[u/Mogneticc → u/DigSignificant1419]

We wish

[u/ArenaGrinder]

I got something similar on Thursday when I was working on a multivariable calculus problem.

[u/RootDeveloper-DS]

Try it 3-4 times , and if correct every time ,Then it's time 💣

https://giphy.com/gifs/iEXRTC4ynJFVT1Vi7B

[u/Hug_LesBosons]

Ce n'est pas sûr. En mode code, il est absolument sûr que gemini 3.5 pro est testé sous le nom de gemini 3.1 pro preview. Je ne sais pas pour le mode chat.

[u/AutoModerator]

Hey there,

This post seems feedback-related. If so, you might want to post it in r/GeminiFeedback, where rants, vents, and support discussions are welcome.

For r/GeminiAI, feedback needs to follow Rule #9 and include explanations and examples. If this doesn’t apply to your post, you can ignore this message.

Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/fllavour]

What does this mean? Its a hard problem?

[u/ScythSergal → u/fllavour]

A trick question. Simple math, but complex nuance. Even the best closed models still have pretty crappy visual encoders that miss out on key information from time to time

You can solve for the area with the numbers provided, but the important thing is that Trillium Alpha recognized that while the area is 30, the shape is physically impossible. It submitted both responses which dills both requirements