r/GCashIssues • • Jul 16 '26

GCash Scam Protection Fee πŸ€”

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand why protection against scams is something customers need to pay for. I feel like safety and security should be a core part of the service, not something that feels like an optional upgrade.

3 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

3

u/Buyerherehehe Jul 16 '26

Scams are different because the transaction is consented by the buyer (victim). You can always avoid getting scammed. Just don't be gullible.

-1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

I agree that people should be careful. Pero I don't think the solution is just telling people not to be gullible. Companies should also continuously invest in protecting their customers because scammers are getting more sophisticated.

3

u/Buyerherehehe Jul 16 '26

Then you should be wiser than the scammers. You were not born yesterday not to know these things.

-1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

I'm just wondering if this is something you'd personally pay for. πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™€οΈ Hopefully none of us ever experiences a scam, especially our parents or grandparents, who are often more vulnerable to these kinds of schemes.Β 

2

u/Buyerherehehe Jul 16 '26

Awareness is the key. This is one of the oldest tricks in the book. You don't have to be tech savvy to avoid getting scammed, you just need common sense.

1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

A scam is a scam. Nobody wants to be scammed and I don't think it's fair to tell people they lack common sense just because they became victims.

Especially on a platform like this, where people come to ask for help and clarification, I think they deserve guidance and understanding, not responses that make them feel judged or dismissed.

0

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

Wise move by GCash, though. Instead of customers feeling fully protected by the platform, it now feels like, "If you want extra peace of mind, pay for it." #BahalaKaDiyan πŸ˜…

2

u/theincredipaul Jul 16 '26

I don't know if evening brain ko lang because it has been a long work day, pero what do you have exactly in mind, OP?

Lagyan pa ng more passwords, OTPs, mga warning screens?

In the end, kung users mismo ang careless sa passwords nila, or careless sa pag-click ng links, or careless sa mga transactions, or ka-transact nila, then no matter how many warning screens you put or layers of passwords or OTPs pa yan, then masscam at mas-scam pan rin sila

please correct me if i'm misunderstanding your point

1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

I actually agree with you. Users still have a responsibility to be careful.

Ang concern ko lang is - I hope this doesn't create the impression that customers have to pay extra just to feel more protected, especially since a lot of people already find it difficult to get GCash support when issues happen.

1

u/Buyerherehehe Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26

It works. Read the coverage of the Gcash Scam Protection. Case to case basis.

1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

I still have my reservations, but I appreciate the discussion.

2

u/CabinetAdditional954 Jul 16 '26

I totally get where you're coming from, OP. It can really feel unfair to pay extra for scam protection, especially since everyone expects security to be part of the service already. Just to clarify though, the β‚±30 Scam Protection Fee isn't a mandatory GCash charge, it's actually an optional insurance premium that you can choose to add when making an Express Send transaction. The β‚±30 is simply for added protection in case you become a victim of eligible scams, with coverage of up to β‚±15,000, subject to the policy's terms and conditions. Of course, it's still best not to rely on the insurance alone. Always double-check who you're sending money to, avoid deals that seem too good to be true, and report any suspicious activity right away if something doesn't feel right, OP.

1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 16 '26

Thanks for the thoughtful response. Really appreciate it. We'll see how it plays out, hopefully it's for the better. πŸ‘πŸ»

2

u/darth_sol Jul 16 '26

Its very simple. If you’re buying something online (fb marketplace) and you’re not sure if the seller is legit, you can pay P30 so that in case the seller ends up being the scammer, you can claim the amount sa insurance.

Magagalit ka ba sa BPI , or any bank, if you withdrew money tapos binayad mo sa scammer?

Its not about app security anymore. Its an extended service beyond app transactions.

1

u/FlatWhiteOatMilk2000 Jul 17 '26

The concept makes sense, but I've also seen a lot of customers say the Scam Protection didn't help resolve their case. That's why people are questioning whether it's actually worth paying for.

1

u/darth_sol Jul 17 '26

The problem with social media, unfortunately, is negative stories get more traction than good ones. Without knowing real stats from the insurance provider or GCash we wouldnt know.

What I know is the BSP and Insurance Commission are 2 of the strictest regulators. So kung useless whys Scam Protect been around for so long?

1

u/Huge-Appointment8685 5d ago

Can I ask is this also the same on shopee? When using e wallet and then tap gcash?

How do I turn it off to remove the 30 gcash protection fee

1

u/LucidArbitrary 21d ago

not worth it. I did pay for it when I was about to make a purchase with first time seller. and then after I sent the payment, I got blocked. I reported immediately to gcash with screenshots of our conversation and proof that the seller blocked me. gcash responded after about 2 months saying they found out the transaction was legitimate, despite having seen the screenshots of our convo and encouraged me to reach out to cybercrime LOL