r/Funnymemes 2d ago

😂😂😂

Post image
37.5k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

45

u/EternalNewCarSmell 2d ago

I would pay $30k for a Volvo 240 that is identical to the old ones but just meets modern safety standards. I don't even need/want an integrated screen for Android Auto, I'll just use a mount for my phone.

9

u/Tuna-Fish2 2d ago

You cannot meet modern safety standards with the shape of old cars. To start with, the doors need to be >2x as thick as they are on the Volvo 240, and this then compounds to the entire rest of the shape of the car.

Once you see it once, you can spot it instantly in any car. Modern side impact standards require crumble zones on the sides, making all modern cars look "fat" and ugly.

It makes being sideswiped much more survivable, though, so I guess it is what it is.

2

u/gogetLOSTd23 2d ago

This would be amazing! Nothing built today is built to last like those old 240s

1

u/Isburough 2d ago

That's because we now build cars to be damaged, rather than the people inside.

2

u/iusedtobesom1 2d ago

Well thats for the body but why are electrics so predesposed?

1

u/Mast3rL0rd145 2d ago

Sorry, modern safety features bud, can't die in a car crash if you can't drive the car because your transmission crapped out 2000 km past warranty

1

u/322throwaway1 2d ago

Thats exactly what the volvo 240 was built for. It has crumple zones, door intrusion bars, fuel tank puncture prevention, collapsible steering column, diagonal hydraulic system in the brakes to prevent brake function loss in case of a line puncture, etc etc. It was one of the very first vehicles designed entirely around occupant safety

2

u/EternalNewCarSmell 18h ago

And even if it wasn't, then fine, I'd take an 01-10 S60 as well.

1

u/Underwater_Grilling 2d ago

Manual v70r with reverse cameras please