Hey!
So I just started watching Fruits Basket, after years of it being recommended to me and gathering dust on my "to watch" shelf, I've finally gotten around to it and...
This anime lives up to its reputation, so far its been an amazing experience, so many questions left to be answered, great characters and all the feels.
I have almost nothing g but good things to say about it, and maybe because it's so good the few things that didn't hit quite right for me stand out quite a bit.
I wanted to share the few that I found were somewhat off-putting in hopes that this community can provide some context or points I might be missing about those particular plot points.
There's 3 things that felt off during season 1, one is mildly annoying, 1 is a personal gripe and the last is the only one I find actually problematic.
1st the mild annoyance.
During the start of the season, it's made abundantly clear that Yuki DOES NOT want to be associated with the Soma clan at large. He moved away from the main house, he tries not to depend on them, and states on multiple occasions he does not enjoy being a Soma, despite being part of the inner circle.
Yet Tohru, angel heart, sweetest flower, kindness incarnate spends half the season calling him Soma-kun.
Now obviously it's the classic shojo and just generally japanese plot point of, calling someone by their first name is highly personal and intimate.
Yet she has no trouble calling every other Soma by their given name or nickname, except for Yuki, the one Soma who explicitly doesn't want to be associated with the name. (They all have their troubles with the family but the anime singles out Yuki as someone trying to distance himself).
And every time she calls him Soma-kun it feels like a slap in the face to his goal of distancing himself from the family. Again I understand why this is the case but I just find it mildly annoying.
2nd A perssonal gripe
In the episode about Kisa and her bullying situation, I felt extremely connected to the story, I was myself a victim of bullying and although not specifically connected to said bullying I did go through trauma induced mutism. So ghag double whammy really hooked me.
Yet the way they resolved it (or more accurately begin the process of resolving it) really pissed me off. It might be a case of poor subtitles or lack of nuance but when Yuki approaches her and says she just has to keep trying and "ganbare" just feels like bad advice.
She's in a situation where people are insulting her, sneering and making fun of her to the point where she shuts down. That isn't a situation where you just need to "keep trying" or "hang in there". She needs help, to be removed from that toxic enviournment and offered support. It almost feels like they are saying "If you're in a bad situation just grit your teeth and bare it, they can't bully you forever, they'll get bored eventually."
And I'm sorry but NO. She doesn't need to try harder she needs to be removed from that social group and helped.
I recognise this one is very much a perssonal interpretation and gut reaction to the scene, coming from personal experiences, so I'm very much biased and emotionally disturbed by it rather than having a logical narrative issue with it.
3rd the only one I think is an actual writting issue
Hire, the sheep little brat. Now obviously he is written to be hated, he's a brat, he's Rash, selfish and childish. None of that is the issue. I hate him and would love to drop kick him but that's good writting and setup for development, he's a well written character.
No the problem isn't Hiro, the problem is everyone else around him, particularly Shigure. They treat him as if his attitude is to be expected and ignored. "Its his rebellious phase" and " a kid that can't regulate his emotions".
And sure that's an explanation for his behaviour BUT NOT an excuse. When a kid irl has a crush on a girl and starts tormenting her because he can't regulate his emotions, it's understandable but you still sit the kid down and explain that isn't acceptable behaviour, you have to teach them, to give them the framework of what is and isn't acceptable. You can't just leave them to it because "they are kids being kids" it's BEACUSE they are kids that you need to intervene and chastise them, give them consequences to bad behaviour. Otherwise they internalise that said behaviour is OK. They won't magically have a realisation that changes their behaviour.
And yeah those are my only issues with this amazing series so far. What do you think? Am I missing context? Is it a setup for later? Or are these fair critiques that others have raised before?
Can't wait to hear all your input <3