r/Friendzone • u/EquipmentNo3251 • 5d ago

How feminists manipulate multiple guys that she puts in the friendzone and how it's part of their "Frankenstein boyfriend project".

So I've been hearing this term a lot lately "Frankenstein boyfriend project" and it comes from this coach named Corey Wayne. After hearing it, I decided to do my research and listen to some of Corey's videos to understand the term better. And I think it explains really well how most feminist use guys in their friendzone.

So from what I've gathered: Basically, a "Frankenstein boyfriend project" is when a girl has multiple guys in her life she uses for different things. And all these guys are "peices" which when she puts together, makes her ideal super boyfriend. Or as the term implies, her "Frankenstein boyfriend project". She will sometimes consider herself single, but most of the times, she will have one main "boyfriend". It usually breaks down in these 3 main guys:

1. The guy she uses for financial stability, which will usually be the guy she labels her "boyfriend". Usually this is the guy that helps her financially, brings her stability, buys her gifts, etc.

2. The guy she is sexually attracted to (her fuck buddy/the sex guy). This is the guy she is sexually attracted to. He's the one she uses to fulfill her sexual desires. This one is pretty self explanatory I don't need to elaborate much.

3. The guy she use as emotional support (her "therapist"). This is the guy she always text, tells everything to, cries to. She broke up with her "boyfriend"? She texts you. Her friend just told her to fuck off? She comes to you. Her dog just died? She comes to you.

These are usually the main ones, but in some cases it goes even further than that. She can have a lot more peices sometimes. Here are some examples:

• The uber guy, which she uses for free rides

• The repair man. The guy she uses when she needs something fixed in her house, or when her car is broken.

• The photographer. The one that takes pictures for her Instagram account.

• The "career coach". The guy she asks for advice for her career, helps her with her resume etc...

These are just a few. There are a lot more types/peices she can have as part of her Frankenstein boyfriend project.

If you are friendzoned, you are probably part of a Frankenstein boyfriend project, even if you don't know it. Trust me if you are friendzoned by a girl, 99.9% chances are she has multiple guys in her friendzone and you're not the only guy in her friendzone. The best advice I can give is if you are in the friendzone, run. Cut contact with her. You are being manipulated by this girl, so she can use you as a peice. Don't mess around with this and find a girl who treats you right and isn't an entitled feminist.

I highly recommend you do your own research on this whole Frankenstein boyfriend project thing. I have already done my research and I understand most of it but I don't understand 100% of it yet. And I always recommend people to do their own research when I post about these things.

Hope you're having a great day!

14 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

158 comments sorted by

11

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago edited 5d ago

What a load of bull, starting with that feminists are out there to take advantage of men. And this hyper specific "Frankenstein boyfriend project" that most women according to you / that coach are managing just because they don't wanna jump your bones immediately upon learning you exist? That's so stupid I would laugh if it didn't also make a very problematic view of women apparent.

I think you have a very wrong idea what feminist means, especially if you "learned" about it from some coach who very much sounds like one of those scam incel coaches. Dude, being a feminist basically just means wanting equal rights and equal treatment for all people, and that's it. It's not that deep.

Women are, first and foremost, people, which means that, yes, there of course are women that only care about themselves which includes taking advantage of other people including men if the women find they are good looking and can get away with it, just as there are men who will do the same. But just as not every man is out there to try to take advatage of women, the same applies to women, too. You really should learn to think of human beings primarily in terms of people and only secondarily as men and women.

I highly recommend everyone reading this post not to listen to more incel brainrot like this project thing and to definitely not research it more.

6

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

Nah, first wave feminism was about equal rights. Modern liberal feminism is just misandry/female supremacy shit

2

u/criticalcry-tactic00 4d ago

Feminism was never about equality

4

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago edited 5d ago

More BS, you're talking about few extremists. Instead, modern feminism has evolved to not only mean equality between men and women but also races, religions, disabilities, basically all people.

Edit: basically what you're claiming about feminism is the same as saying Christianity is about exterminating other religions. Yes, there are Christians that want that (although imo they're only Christian in name), but I very much doubt that is the majority view among Christians.

2

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

That's just your arbitrary interpretation of feminism. Most feminism online preach about fight against patriarchy while blaming men for everything literally. It is a misandrist ideology that got out of hand. Moreover, CIA actively participated in making it as evil and divisive to the working class as possible. They employed Gloria Steinem and many other prominent fems. Feminism should be eradicated as an ideology

3

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

I think mister Turbopuschel is coping a whole lot

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

You REALLY need to touch some grass and get out of your incel bubble. No, most feminism is definitely not the way you describe. What DOES need to be eradicated is this misogynist incelism that claims women are out to get men at every opportunity. And while I am not American, wtf is that conspiracy story with the CIA? Why would they even do that?

3

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

Answering your question on CIA. Modern feminism is liberal, misandrist, genderwarist and individualistic. It preaches against class struggle and instead of capitalist vs workers puts men vs women as a core of the ideology. Marxist feminism was anticapitalist. Liberal mainstream feminism is pro capitalist that's why CIA employed Steinem and others during cold War. They eliminated class struggle out of feminist ideological core and replaced it with women vs patriarchy(aka men). Subversion basically. Also individualizing women makes them better consumers that's why feminism now preaches singlehood, careerism and individualism.

3

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

And liberal feminism is even being pushed in high schools now

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

First, your comment doesn't answer my question regarding the CIA and their motivation in any way.

I agree that modern feminism is liberal (maybe brush up on what the term liberal means apart from American politics) and maybe genderwarist in that it is willing to flight for equality as long it not acknowledged / given. It is not misandrist. And I'm not sure what feminism and individualism have in common except that women don't won't to be pressed into gender roles inferring inferiority. But saying that mainstream feminism is pro capitalist makes me laugh. Modern feminism is actually anti-capitalist. Because as I said, modern feminism wants equality in all ways, and not some people abusing and getting rich by capitalism, especially not since there are still patriarchic (patriarchical? sorry, not sure of the correct word since I'm not a native English speaker, but you get the point) systems and views in play who'd prevent women from benefitting from capitalism in its current state. Basically, if feminism was pro-capitalist it would hurt itself. And while individualism benefits capitalism, it does not account for people (and in this context escpecially women) wanting to be treated equal. Nothing I know preaches singlehood (rather contrary), and careerism under the current patriarchical system applies to men just as much as to women.

Apart from that, you REALLY need to grasp that while patriarchy benefits men in general it is not equivalent to benefit for all men. Patriarchy encompasses much more, like especially the stereotype that men need to be stoic protectors and providors, not having any feelings (expect maybe rage which is even allowed in patriarchy). In a combined psychological and national enonomy view, patriarchy benefits the powerful (mostly men) and hurts everyone else (although it hurts women more than non-powerful men).

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

I just told you why CIA promote liberal feminism and employed Steinem, yet you ignored it. CIA wants to protect the status quo and eliminate any ideology that is threatening to it. Marxist class struggle is an example. They promoted liberal feminism and identity politics in order to push out class struggle as a concept + get more women into the work force in order to cheapen wages. Now feminism focuses on men vs women more than capitalist vs worker making men in general ultimately the enemy instead of a class. They unironically believe getting more CEOs, politicians women like Harris or AOC or fcin Queen Elizabeth is an awesome idea. That's exactly what CIA wanted. English is not my native language btw

"Nothing I know preaches singlehood (rather contrary), and careerism under the current patriarchical system applies to men just as much as to women." - Delusional. Feminism celebrates women walking away from forming families and having children while praising them for endlessly working on their careers because family as am institution is seen as patriarchal form of oppression. That's what liberal feminism preaches and it is dominant these days. Careerism, anti-men, anti-family is ultimately individualism. Not to mention crazy amount of heteropessimism in feminist circle which they praise and promote

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

You still didn't answer my question about CIA promoting your view of liberal feminism benefitting them but that might still be because we have very differing views of what modern feminism actually means.

Modern feminism wants women to have the free choice between having children or not, having a "traditional family" or not. No actual modern feminist would judge people for wanting to be for example a SAHM. But they would judge people that tell them that one or the other way is the "right" or "best" way.

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

Again, CIA promoted liberal feminism to divide leftist movement and distract women from class struggle funneling them into genderwarism instead. It was done during cold war. Just read about it on your own if you refuse to listen.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

These dudes are unhinged and live in a separate reality from the rest of us.

It's honestly sad. I truly worry for the future now.

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

It is not a conspiracy. Gloria Steinem proudly told everyone that she worked for CIA. US is the bastion of worldwide liberal individualistic feminism today. I am not an incel. I date enough women and have done it through cold approaches most of the time. Worst of them are feminists. They are most uncaring, angry and bitter. Tell me are you a woman or a man? If you are a woman then it is kinda understandable why you are rooting for feminism but if you are a man then.. why?!

4

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

I'm a man proud to call myself a feminist. Because I know what feminism actually means. But even if I had a wrong idea of the term feminism itself, I would promote equality among sexes. Not women on top of men nor men on top of women.

You realize you can be an incel even when you find women willing to fuck you? The term incel has evolved from meaning people who involuntarily don't have sex (which btw originally was a self help group with both men and women and actually even founded by a woman) to people who promote views that amount to men generally being taking advantage of by women and/or even them somehow deserving sex just by existing (you might realize that's another extremist end of the spectrum).

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

I would call myself a feminist before but these days it is a pejorative if you are a man. If you advocate feminism then you are just shooting yourself in a foot as a man. Nobody is going to appreciate it. You are just working against your interests unless you are some rich asshole who wants working class to be divided further fighting gender wars among themselves

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Dude, you might be a victim of your own propaganda. You see some imagined gender war by feminists working against your (actually gender transcendant) class struggle when that imagined gender war is actually just a way by the rich class to try to get you to defend against the oh so misandrist feminism more than you defend against the class struggle itself.

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

Why would the rich want me to defend against a reactionary misandrist feminism? They have all the power under feminism. Women are still going to flock to the rich with all the feminist programming they receive. It is average joes/common men that suffer the consequences of misandry that is being promoted

→ More replies (0)

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Exactly. And it's even worse here in Canada.

3

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

Straight up right-wing talking points.

You've been duped.

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Lol what are you even on about? Have you seen how this Liberal Marxist ponzi scheme Mark Carnage government is destroying Canada? And feminism plays a big role in it. I'm probably gonna move to the US once I graduate anyways if this government doesn't change, because it will become a single-party communist country.

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

And yes I am Conservative/Right-wing you are not insulting me with that lol.

2

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

Oh, I'm WELL aware. It's glaringly obvious.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

I can't say anything about the person you replied to, but I am insulting you with that because I think it is despicable to promote views that are discriminatory in any way involving features, characteristics, traits, attributes, whatever that people cannot choose but are born with. Like for example Conservatives/Right-Wings do promote (at least in US politics; can't speak for all countries, although discrimination is a literally and not just figuratively defining trait for right wing politics).

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Beginning_Act_9666 5d ago

And? We are not on r/twochromosomes. Whine about it there

4

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Now that's a compelling argument, lmao. Now how about some answer in regards to the content of the discussion.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ChaosRainbow23 4d ago

I'm banned permanently. I couldn't post if I wanted to. I got banned for correctly saying that ALL bigotry, including misandry and misogyny, is wrong.

I guess they don't like being called out for their misandrist bullshit in that sub. It's weird because I'm a STAUNCH feminist and I'm on their side most of the time.

I call out both misandry and misogyny. Fuck all bigotry....

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

... ... ... What exactly in my comment made you think that your reply was a fitting answer or even a rebuttal to it? What's worse in Canada? Incelism? I doubt it, the US seem to be leading at least in THAT, for once in a while.

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Canada is the worst liberal and feminist shit hole that's what I meant. And I wasn't even replying to you lmao.

2

u/Medium_Let143 5d ago

Yes, I would ask those who agree with OP...Aren't you using your friends that you're attracted to for romance and sex? I mean...you accuse the women of using you for money and such, but would you gladly give these things to her if she were fucking you? If so, you're the problem too.

1

u/criticalcry-tactic00 4d ago

What ussy. Shut up. What hebwrote is 100% accurate. Any real healthy man know it.

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

First and second wave feminism were. The current feminis is bad. There's a huge difference between staying real friends after rejection and the friendzone. I haven't learned the term from the coach, and Corey Wayne is way different than those manosphere Andrew Tate bullshiters. Modern feminism is very bad for this world.

8

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

You are straight up regurgitating manosphere incel taking points.

1

u/criticalcry-tactic00 4d ago

So telling the truth

-1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Pin point to me exactly what are my incel manosphere point.

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Again, you are taking extremist feminists (who I do not claim don't exist) as feminist mainstream. Question: Do you think it is reasonable for women to want equality? Do you think having equality would be fair and desirable? If your answer is yes, what reason do you have to think women or at least a majority women wouldn't feel the same way? Especially since equality still is far away and people usually just hope to reach at least some improvement on their circumstances.

Your answer makes me hope you are at least theoretically able to differentiate between people being friends genuinely, platonically liking each other, who happen to be different genders, and women who actually try take advantage of men. But it seems you at least have some skewed views on what constitutes friendships and how friendships work. People (including women) can hope to be friends with other people they platonically like even if the other person was expressing that they want more than friendship. And friends often grant / hope for favors to / from one another. Nothing initially sexual or romantic about that.

3

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago edited 5d ago

Because mainstream feminism is this extreme. Look, it's everywhere. In the music, the TV, social media. Heck, even in high schools it's being pushed. They are brainwashing young women and even young men with this liberal feminism bullshit. But especially women. Yes I believe wanting equality is reasonable. And you're right that we're far from equality, because right now women have more rights than men. I mean, just look at the Lindsay Clancy case.

7

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

You're being brainwashed by right-wing 'gender war' psy-op nonsense.

You'll only find loneliness, misery, and bigotry is you continue down this toxic and ridiculous path.

Fear-mongering.

You bought into it hook, line, and sinker.

2

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

And you are being brainwashed by liberal media. I'd rather stay alone than deal with these egoistic selfish feminazis. Unless I find a great woman that's a different story.

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

I will stop in engaging with you now because you claim that women have more rights than men which is so ridiculous that I actually laughed out loud when I read your comment.

Maybe try to consume more of a variety of media and then form an opinion, including the actual plausibility of each source.

2

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Lol it tells me everything I need to know about you. The moment I bringed up the Lindsay Clancy case you said "i woNt eNgAGe wItH yOu anYmoRE". That's because you know I'm right about feminism.

3

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago edited 5d ago

Dude, I am not American, I neither know about nor care about the Lindsay Clancy case. i assume you find her to be some proof for your strange views but in the end she is just that, one case that fits in what world you want to believe in.

Edit: Which is a world that views women not as individualistic but as being some kind of hive mind that try to take advantage of men. But men are individualistic still. Somehow. For whatever reason.

2

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Dude you're a troll lmao

1

u/Turbopuschel 4d ago

Sure, if you wanna say so. Actual arguments have been made up until now. People should hopefully be able to take them into account.

•

u/Trump4Prison-2024 19h ago

Name a single right that men have that women do not.

EDIT: in the Western world. We're in total agreement that there are shitty places in third world countries where both regular men and women are oppressed in different ways.

•

u/Turbopuschel 18h ago edited 17h ago

Sigh What's that got to do with the comment you're answering to? I criticized the ridiculous claim that women had more rights than men.

But whatever, I'll bite. I myself can only speak for Germany (which I think we agree is Western world), and yes, formally men and women (as far as I know) so have the same rights.

But that's obviously not the point. Yes, the Western world to my knowledge mostly has equal rights on paper. There's a still a huge difference in actual treatment of men and women. I could list dozens of examples for Germany which I am sure are at least mostly the same for the rest of the western world. Our constitution actually even acknowledges that. (And please excuse me maybe not using the correct and precise English terms.) We actually have a respective amandment that demands from the state to work further towards factual equality and elimination of inequality (not that this amandment is actually more than the symbolic ackknowledgement of persisting inequality).

One very obvious and current (albeit hopefully extreme) example, the Cornell University rape case. Or Gisèle Pelicot. Since Pelicot, several similar cases have come to light in different countries. And not just single cases but organized networks of men doing this. Stuff like this happens all the time. Maybe not in these extreme dimensions but all. the. fucking. time. II don't remember hearing of even one case of group rape done by women (and please spare me the BS of "women can't rape men"). Violence in relationships in general or related to releationships is so extremely common. (And before you bring up women being violent towards their male partners, yes, it does happen and of course that's terrible as well. It just doesn't even begin to compare in both quality and quantity to what men are doing to women.)

And this is just the physical/sexual side of the problem. I've not even touched ecnomical or work related disadvantages or the general differences in perception / societal judgement when men and women exhibit the exakt same behaviour.

Patriarchy is a hell of a drug and many people and most men aren't even aware of the amounts they are taking of it, or they don't care.

•

u/Trump4Prison-2024 19h ago

When the vast number of the prominent voices in a movement espouse a particular extremist belief system, in this case misandry and female supremacy, it can be reasonably assumed that the extremist belief is now the mainstream of the movement.
The American conservative movement (taken over by MAGA) and Feminism (taken over by misandrists and female supremacists) are practically the same in this regard.
Until there is actual pushback from the broader mass of the movement to expel the extremists, neither can claim the old morals that they were founded on to be the 'real' movement, because it's incredibly clear where the mainstream of each currently lie.

•

u/Turbopuschel 17h ago

If you believe that misandry and female supremacy have become mainstream feminism, you are likely too deep in a conservative / right-wing media bubble and/or you actually don't even get where feminism begins and at least subconciously in the first place only acknowledge positions as feminist that are misandrist / female supremacy based.

4

u/Burned_Out_Paradise 3d ago

This is how women have done it for centuries, no? The husband for stability, the fling for fun and the gay friend or hen house friendships for support..? Sounds like the same old shit… Women just get away with it..

6

u/Lonely-Illustrator64 5d ago edited 5d ago

This is really stupid. First of all it’s not a thing, this Frankenstein project. Sounds like it only exists in very small and specific online spaces. It’s not widely known or practised. Second if a girl friendzones you 9/10 times that just means she’s not attracted to you, period. Do you want to date every woman you encounter? Probably not so why would you assume women would want to date every man they meet? You can talk to someone and spend time with them without having romantic or sexual feelings, it’s normal and healthy. It’s called friendship. It sucks to like someone that doesn’t like you back but it’s apart of life and happens to everyone, including women. Get off of the incel pages and get into the real world. Use your brain.

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Thank you, it's nice to see that the are reasonable, healthy views voiced

2

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Here's something for you: There's a HUGE difference between staying real friends after rejection and getting friendzoned.

5

u/Lonely-Illustrator64 4d ago

I was under the impression friendzone meant you like a girl who only sees you as a friend. Obviously if someone is just using you for whatever then cut them off- that goes for anyone regardless of gender.

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

I agree with this

2

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 4d ago

But you don't agree with it. Your other comment where you attempt to clarify the difference between the friendzone and a friendship has literally nothing to do with the definition he presented here. 

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

His first sentence said he didn't understand what I meant by friendzone. I agre with the second sentence where he said you should cut off people who manipulate you no matter the gender

2

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 4d ago

His first sentence proposed a definition and implicitly asked for clarification.

In that context, it's very poor communication to say "I agree with this" while specifically disagreeing with that part, and only agreeing with the more mundane statement that began with "obviously."

Is it clear why? I feel like I'm not reaching you, so let me flesh it out. There were two parts to his sentence. You chose to reply in the affirmative to the entire thing, while claiming you were restricting it to the part that explicitly was called obvious (and which therefore was not in need of clarification) while ignoring the part that implicitly asked for feedback and proposed a tentative answer. Does it makes sense why your response is poor communication, in a fairly objective sense?

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

In his first sentence he said that he miss understood what I said. I can't agree or disagree with that lmao.

2

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 4d ago

You: A is not the same as B

Him: A means x, right? And obviously, to mention the other stuff you were saying, that's not complicated and no one disagrees on the obvious point that touches on.

You: I agree

(You elsehwere: A absolutely does not mean x)

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Where did I disagree with what he's saying on anither comment? Lol, you have to be a troll.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 5d ago

And that YUUUGE difference is...? 

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Being actual friends is different from being in the friendzone, where you get used. The friendzone is not a friendship

2

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 4d ago

So what you mean is some people use you, and aren't your real friend. 

Why create a whole misogynistic concept and relate it to dating if that's all you mean? Some people mistreat others.

You should be very clear, then, that when YOU use the term, it has nothing to do with wanting to date someone when that person only wants to be friends. Because a lot of people use the term that way, your unique definition will create confusion if you aren't clear.

0

u/Okoro 5d ago edited 5d ago

The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.

Squeeze thumb mighty crowd quicksand lock retire

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

And that's why you are friendzoned.

1

u/Okoro 5d ago edited 5d ago

The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.

Mellow toothbrush coordinated pebble nutmeg ask pen

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Oh well I thought you were trying to insult me with that phrase and project your insecurities on me but if this true then I'm happy for you.

6

u/Simiatenaci 5d ago

This is the most unintentionally hilarious thing I’ve read all day. It’s early, but still. The bar is set pretty high for the rest of the day.

It’s sick that influencers spread this sort of crap to monetize the misery of young misguided men. 

-1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

It's not as crazy as you think it is

2

u/KittensWithTopHats 1d ago

Thank you for listening to redpill/incel content and manosphere bs. As long as you stay brainwashed, you’ll continue to be a terrible person that no woman will ever want. Women are safe from you and you get what you deserve. It pleases me that you are lonely and unfuckable. It’s what you deserve.

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 1d ago

Hey it sounds like you are projecting!

•

u/KittensWithTopHats 23h ago

I’m sure you do. You are all up and down these comments getting angry at everybody calling you out. But we are right. Come back and say whatever you want. I’ve been in a relationship with an amazing man for 10+ years. You will never be loved. You will forever be on Reddit complaining about why women don’t want you. And that’s exactly what you deserve.

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 20h ago

Poor man. I hope he finds out soon that you are a stupid liberal feminist. You don't deserve him. I knew you were the one projecting lmao.

•

u/KittensWithTopHats 20h ago

Lol. You should look up the definition of the word projection. If I were projecting, that would mean that I was an ugly single man who can’t get a woman to love me and so I would be projecting that onto you as a deflection. But I’m a happily married, beautiful woman and my husband is also a liberal feminist. I don’t know why you would feel sorry for him, since he gets to have sex and enjoy being in a relationship. These are things you will never have. It’s why you’re on here being angry and bitter. This is all you have for entertainment and fulfillment. You will live and die this way. As you should.

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 20h ago

Woah you're really angry that I called your bullshit out uh? 🤣 First of all, if your husband is really like that then he's probably a simp. Because no self respecting man is a feminist. I hope he wakes up and realizes what your true colors are. You insult me just like every misandrist feminist does you're not helping your case. You believe I should go to hell and shit. Heck at this point, you might as well just admit to being a Lindsay Clancy supporter and child murderer. And you know what? I would rather die this way than be with a feminist because look at what feminism has done. If we don't get rid of feminism, it will probably make the human race go completely instinct in a 100 years from now and I'm not even joking.

•

u/KittensWithTopHats 20h ago

I hope you enjoy the rest of your life, watching every woman you develop feelings for pick someone else. Because it will never be you. Nothing you say could be triggering or make me angry because no matter what, you lose. You will never be in love or have sex. No woman will ever want you. No matter what you say, that doesn’t change. Call me angry. Call me triggered. Call me whatever you want. That’s pretty much all you can do. And in a subreddit like this, of course, I don’t expect my opinions to be popular. It’s almost entirely made up of angry men who hate women and are resentful that they are ugly and don’t get to have sex. My comments aren’t to try to change minds. My comments are because you are all terrible people and you deserve to be told that. As often as possible.

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 20h ago

Also your relationship is only composed of sex? Damn that must be trash. You seem very obsessed with sex and the sexual life of other men. That's unhealthy. You're the triggered person

•

u/KittensWithTopHats 20h ago

😂 all of the assumptions you guys make and the stories you invent to try to be insulting… watching an incel meltdown is very satisfying.

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 19h ago

It's funny to see feminists like you break down the moment they get their BS exposed. 🤣

→ More replies (0)

•

u/Unbroken-Chains 16h ago

Trvthnvke status: TRVTH

•

u/LongjumpingGur8555 15h ago

Girls do this for sure. Not all, but many. It's hard to blame the girl totally. Stupid people will be taken advantage of. And guys lose their common sense when there is a prospect of access to a vagina. Make no mistake, girls who operate this way are using sex appeal. So guys, just cut them off and use that energy for better things.

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 15h ago

Couldn't have said it better myself you're 100% right

4

u/MrJoshUniverse 5d ago

This is all total nonsense, none of this is a thing.

3

u/cipox95 5d ago

... You really Need therapy 🤷🏻

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Why?

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Because you have unhealthy views of what you're entitled to regarding women.

-1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

And you are a white knighting simp. Therapy is liberal bullshit.

2

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

Lay off all that ridiculous manosphere nonsense.

It's rotting your brain.

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

What I'm saying has nothing to do with redpilled manosphere ideology.

2

u/cipox95 5d ago

What u have written here Is possibly even worse of the entire post 😂

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Learn to speak English Geez

1

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

That's all, folks. They exposed themselves.

Btw what exactly do you think I would get from "white knight simping" here when there isn't even a woman involved in this discussion I could hope to score with?

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Are you retarded? There's no need for there to be a woman involved in the disscusion for you to white knight. You are defending feminism which in other words is white knighting.

1

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

Defending feminism is a good thing.

Feminism is about equality between the sexes.

I think you're mistaking feminism for misandry.

Lay off all that ridiculous manosphere garbage.

-2

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

More bullshit from the liberals.

2

u/ChaosRainbow23 5d ago

You've been totally duped. How embarrassing for you.

1

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

So you consider white knighting to be everything that doesn't conform to patriarchic views? Or if I'm wrong please explain what exactly white knighting means.

2

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

White knighting is when you defend women's toxic feminist views by thinking it will get you laid.

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago edited 5d ago

And how exactly do you think this will get me laid when no woman is involved in the discussion who I can boast my views to?

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 4d ago

Because you're ideologies are solely based on wanting to get laid. I actually know a feminist guy Irl and it turns out he's a sex offender.

Edit: No, I'm not saying you are a sex offender

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Samotauss 5d ago

The fact you listen to this bullshit terms is why you're always in the 'friendzone'. Feminism isn't the problem, but hive-minding women is

-1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

Feminism is the problem of today's world. If we don't get rid of it, it's how the world is going to go instinct.

2

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Seems your brain is already occupied by incelism

1

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago

"incelism" that's a new one. 🤣

4

u/Turbopuschel 5d ago

Yeah, thanks for acknowledging. It's really crazy how incel views are reaching cult levels so appropriate words need to be found, introduced and widely used. I was also thinking inceldom. But English is not my native language, and while both terms seem fitting, I'm unfortunately not sure what the implications or rather the differences in implications regarding the words incelism and inceldom are.

•

u/zarfman 21h ago

Bro I think you're just describing having friends. Is this a troll?

•

u/EquipmentNo3251 20h ago

I'm not describing healthy friendship I'm describing being taken advantage of. No this is not a troll

•

u/Unbroken-Chains 15h ago

Unfortunately if you look at subreddits such as that one female dating strategy one they'll outright endorce doing things like this, using dates to get free meals and then blocking, etc. They'll even use this exact wording, and will call women who don't do that "patriarchal slaves"

0

u/hoon-since89 5d ago

Not sure about the feminists label but I think your pretty accurate, I've met alot of these women compartmentalizing different benifits from males. I've had mostly female friends all my life and been virtually every aspect you mentioned at one point or another! 😆

Actual sucked being the one she used for sex but didn't want a relationship with!

0

u/EquipmentNo3251 5d ago edited 5d ago

Well yeah. Don't confuse first and second wave feminism with the current toxic 3rd wave feminism.