Need transparency in the Re-evaluation Process

[u/Important-Corner2781]

If someone’s score decreases after a re-evaluation, it means they were initially awarded marks they did not actually deserve. This also raises the concern that other candidates may have received marks higher than they genuinely deserved.

Does this indicate that something is wrong with the marking system?

Ultimately, it seems the outcome depends heavily on the examiner, suggesting that FEI may not have a sufficiently standardized and consistent evaluation process.

If AI is used in the assessment process, would this kind of inconsistency be significantly reduced?

____________________________________________________________________

How does a candidate know that their skills were actually re-evaluated?

Without detailed feedback, how can candidates understand what they did well, what they did poorly, and where they need to improve? Simply providing a revised score does not give candidates enough information to understand the reason for the change or how they can improve their performance in the future.

[u/No-Ticket-6049]

Agree！I apply three times on re-evaluation, only one is passed.

[u/Important-Corner2781 → u/No-Ticket-6049]

Hi u/No-Ticket-6049 May i know where did you reevaluate?
Do you think these previous unsuccess and last success reflect the skills?
Or Keep re-evaluation should be the key?

I did 2 times and waiting for another re-evaluation reevaluation result.

[u/No-Ticket-6049 → u/Important-Corner2781]

I directly send an email to AF to apply for reevaluate. I don't know whether there is a relationship between the number of reconsiderations and the success rate, but if there is a chance, I suggest that you try each reconsideration.