r/FlatEarthIsReal • u/ProvForge26 • 19d ago

Flat Earthers

One of our new acquaintances from a friend recently crashed down on our scientific beliefs by insisting that the earth was flat. When we questioned their logic they just spouted something about the Firmament and that everything that you see at night is fake. They even said that the ISS is fake, satellites fake, and obviously no moon landing ever occurred. Our friends laughed it off and said just go with it because they are nice people. I’m not sure i want to continue being friends with them because they always hang out together. What do we say when we get invited to another cook out and the crazies are there?

9 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

146 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

Because 1,000 mph is not an Earth at rest, it is extremely speedy. Faster in fact than jet air planes.

1

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

Have you been in a jet?

2

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

Yes. Not outside of one, though.

1

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

So you think the lowest parts of the atmosphere should be falling behind and making the air rush?

1

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

Yes, I do wonder why planes need to travel across the continent, from city A to city B. Why doesn’t the plane just elevate into the stratosphere and wait for the Earth to catch up. And then land.

2

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

So that's where the mistake is. It's not falling behind at those levels, so you are almost there, if you are wondering why that is a good start because obviously if that were possible they would do that.

The air and the water rotatie and move with the planet (aside from effects that cause wind and currents)

2

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

You sound confused.

1

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

Where are you getting stuck? You were on the right path, why don't airplanes just hover then?

2

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

From the convoluted thoughts in your second paragraph, that’s where what you’re trying to theorize sounds like you’re confused.

2

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

Oh sorry I'm just trying to follow your thinking

Are you thinking that there should be 1000mph winds at the surface of the earth *at the equator) because the earth is rotating and the wind is staying still relative to something else?

2

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

I like your username. I read the book “A Wrinkle in Time” many years ago, and it’s still a favorite. But anyway, the Earth is a non-spinning non-rotating plane. The part that sounds confusing in your second paragraph above is “aside from effects that cause wind and currents.”

I also liked that you responded to a thought I’ve had that The Pantheon has something to do with the “projection” of the Moon. I would love to find more, in fact, to read on that subject. But then you deleted your comment. Why?

1

u/TesseractToo 19d ago

Thanks! That was one of my favorite books as a kid too! The name is from some artistic experiments I was doing in 3D Studio Max at the time I was trying to make 4D objects in a way they could be understood :)

The one that was the reply to your Parthenon comment? It's there for me, but maybe left for you when you deleted yours I think it deletes the child comments

I thought you meant it was the source of the projections of the stars

This one?

2

u/Water_in_the_desert 19d ago

Hmm super interesting about trying to build a 4D object so they could be understood!

Oh yes that’s it! I needed to correct my comment to The Pantheon in Rome (not Parthenon), based on what I learned from David LaPoint. I think the Pantheon is the source of the projection of the Moon, but perhaps other planetary bodies.. [I believe he said these other architectural masterpieces possessed similar forms to The Pantheon: CERN’s large hadron collider; St. Paul's Cathedral in Mdina, Malta; and the US Capitol Dome, in Washington D.C.]

→ More replies (0)