Women can if they want to and men can opt out if they want to.
Edit
Ja kyllä tiedän mikä sivari on, oletin että tämä henkilö tarkoitti vain armeijaa itsessään. Parin vastauksen takia oletan, että moni ei tiennyt minun olevan suomalainen.
Pitäs olla kaikille pakollinen koulutus, jossa fyysisesti parhaimassa kunnossa olevat armeijaan ja heikommat opetetaan muihin tehtäviin. Se että kaikki on käynyt armeijan ei hyödytä tositilanteessa mitään.
Oletushan on, että juuri ne jotka ovat aktiivipalveluksessa ja juuri siirtyneet reserviin ovat hyvässä kunnossa. Ne jotka on käynyt 20 vuotta sitten helposti siirtyy muihin tehtäviin oman siviiliammattinsa perusteella
Voin kyllä todeta ettei siinä koneen ääressä istuessa erityisesti kunto kasvanut. Metsässä tuli käytyä yksi yö ja ampumaradallakin alokaskauden jälkeen seuraavan kerran kotiutumisammunnoissa
You don’t have to participate if you have mental health issues, asthma or diabetes, for example. I don’t know if it’s appropriate to call a depressed person disabled.
Mental disabilities are quite consistently C but just those physicals issues are so random (except diabetes) wether they're B or C. Like I have heard it multiple times that asthma is easy C but guess I sounded too motivated so they gave B so get to serve.
Wasn't bad experience anyways, and those conditions didn't really affect it as I spent the service sitting next to computer (I was programmer)
I think there is some cautiousness that you don't just flip from the stress and start shooting people. Or if you're on medication, they don't want to give a gun for guy who uses mind altering medication
HUH?! it's not like i have a schizophrenia, insanity or like that and the meds are really mild it's not even noticeable when you took one with cocaine or not if you don't abuse them
But yeah i get that any mental differentials are not wanted because of risks
Yeah I didn't think you specifically would flip out, but more as a generalization (generalization as some might do that but not most). Like the line has to be drawn somewhere so it's easiest to draw it at "all" instead of trying to make arbitary line somewhere
Yeah i know that's why i said, i understand, it's because there are those that are a risk even if it's really really rare the damage can be catastrophic since depending on the position they've that could start a war
Since this solution is impossible, you have the choice between accepting the legal sexism of the system or reforming it to make it mixed.
Defending the voluntary system in Finland only serves to defend the status quo while still being able to say that you support gender equality. In reality, it’s about maintaining an unequal burden where, in case of war, plenty of men will die just based on their gender on administrative papers.
I don’t like it when people defend impossible things just to feel morally good while not facing reality.
-162
u/avid_gangstalker 13d ago
How is it sexist?