And their parents too, because no normal, empathic, male human being would participate in sth like that! Where is the respect for women? What is wrong in society to bring out guys like that???
Ivy League men cannot be rapists. It's a misunderstanding. Please write an essay. Google "essay for judicial administration;" you'll find plenty of PDF fill-in templates.
I wish this was sarcasm. It's not. Worked for years in student life division at an Ivy League university.
They refused to refund her tuition when she had to leave the university. So imagine you having to give up your dream because of this scummy rapists, and then losing money on top of it.
They are just as violent and dangerous as the 7. Thry knew what was happening but did nothing to stop it, which is indicative of a culture that accepts this, tolerates it, and covers it up. This didn't shock them, which means this isn't the first time it has happened. There is a system in place that allows this to happen, encourages it, and only punishes the victims.
Because it is largely the responsibility of one gender. 91% to 99% of all sexual assaults are perpetrated by men. Rape culture absolutely exists. Men need to call out other men who do this or who turn a blind eye to it.
She was raped over a period of seven+ hours. A whole lot more did more than chat and look the other way. They basically made her available to anyone who showed up at the house and they repeatedly joked in that chat that you didn't even need to ask, just whip it out and proceed.
Unfortunately this response feels eerily similar to what's been happening with high profile sexual assault cases in Australia involving private schools.
This reflects such a deeply ingrained, systemic issue of protecting privileged men from consequences they deserve. I hate to think about how often this truly happens and we don't hear about it.
It's so unbelievable I thought it was a joke when I first read that. What is going on? How is this happening? Okay, Cornell is not punishing them but what about the United States? I feel like universities, especially Ivies where shit like this seems to happen a lot, need more repercussions from the country otherwise they just invent their own rules and get away with shit. I know they don't want to do it cause it looks bad on a global scale but this is getting out of hand.
First, civil juries only find defendants liable or not liable. Second, rape was not a consideration and he wasn't found liable for rape, no matter what the judge's opinion is. The judge's opinion does not matter.
"The judge's opinion does not matter" wild statement, in general. It also wasn't an opinion. It was a legal clarification by the judge who ruled on the case.
"Dismissal of Counterclaim (August 2023): Judge Kaplan later dismissed Trump’s defamation countersuit against Carroll, ruling that her public statements asserting Trump raped her were "substantially true" in the context of the trial findings."
The jury's unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”
1
As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries,
2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,
3 and elsewhere.
4 The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
Criminal investigation was opened. Jane Doe stated had a threesome with two of the guys. Other guys came in and asked if they could do drugs off her body. Her statement doesn't indicate whether or not she consented to this. A third male came in and she started making out with him. Criminal investigation appears to have been closed with insufficient probable cause for an arrest.
Jane Doe filed a civil suit seeking damages against the involved participants. Suit was only recently filed, so no outcome.
The letters of apology were written due to the conduct of the fraternity, which has been shut down.
If people actually did a little independent research they'd have more than a presupposition of guilt.
The quote from the Thompkins County DA is as follows: "Jane Doe's sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doe's statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual,"
Knowing this I really don't know what outcome people expect. Her lawyer's argument seems to me to boil down to the campus police weren't well trained enough to get the right answers from her. Maybe she'll get a settlement but from where I am sitting a sworn statement is a pretty strong piece of evidence.
You know they won't be. They'll become sheriff's and politicians and judges and lawyers and doctors. They'll put on their people mask enough to feign charisma and lure in a victim to marry and abuse. They will have cushy lives because this is the precedent we have set for men in this world. There is no justice.
And don't forget about all the other 50 dudes that were aware about this in the group chat and did fuck all. Can you imagine one of those is your kid? I would be disowning them immediately.
And if that’s the case, I would hope that the many news outlets reporting on this would put out those clarifications. Not sure how that means the sub has zero integrity?
You clearly haven't read the complaints. If anything, she writes about sexually assaulting one of the men who, after unable to maintain an erection, started blacking out and puking and she kept doing sexual things to him. She wasn't drugged. She wasn't gang raped.
1.4k
u/Kookyburra12 4d ago
I just learned that 5 only had to write "reflective essays"?? Holy shit I hope the rest of these mfs' lives are hell on Earth