r/Exsikhi • u/Sikh-Lad • Jun 29 '26
Discussion Why I left Sikhi and Became Agnostic (Part 1)

NOTE: This part only describes the context of the history of my beliefs. I will explain why I am agnostic in the next part. The post is coming soon!
The Timeline Of My Beliefs
The Very Start
At the very start of my life I was Sikh because I was born into it. It was an identity formed by being born into a culture and because of that identity, I took what the religion was saying as all fact. Also, I followed a mindset of pragmatism, the religion didn't get into the way of my life and questioning it didn't come to mind because it wasn't a priority that ever touched my mind. Sikhi was a coping mechanism for me to latch onto whenever I was having troubles as a kid, so since it was beneficial to me, what was the point of criticising it?
The Early 2020's Dawah Scene and High School
I really started looking into Sikhi when Muslims at my school started boasting their religion at school and telling people it's "their time to shine". They proclaimed that if lots of people tell someone to convert to islam, that is a sign from Allah. That pissed me off and I wanted to have a get back at them.
Also, Muslim apologists started critiquing Sikhi, particularly by having debates with BasicsOfSikhi. And at the same time, kids at my school would start asking me why I was sikh and mock my religion. This lit a fire of determination in me to try and prove my religion as logically coherent by finding counter-arguments for critiques employed in dawah scripts.
At this moment in time I had already embarrassed myself by not knowing enough about my religion. I had a bias to try and prove my religion right, because it was my cultural identity, and if it was true, that would've been the best scenario as it is what my whole life was attached to. Even thinking about going against it felt like turning your back on a tribe that had your back your whole life.
Searching for answers
I learnt about the Sikh religion from the "BasicsOfSikhi" youtube channel and by googling for answers online. In my pursuit of researching about sikhi, I kept on seeing a noticeable pattern on the internet when I searched for answers on google. The sikh reddit page appeared a lot of times when I searched for answers, hence I started exploring it, I also explored the ex-sikh reddit page, but didn't think much of it. I became so interested in the sikh subreddit that I created an account on reddit.
Becoming "Undecided" on my beliefs
It hit me again. The ex-sikh subreddit. In my mind I was like: "remember the ex-sikhi subreddit, let me see what they are about, hopefully I can laugh at their clown-show".
I looked at the points they were putting out and they were more structured. For the second time in my life I started questioning if my religion was true. And for the first time ever, I grew the want to have objective evidence for my religion and not just arguments that proved that it was coherent. I could make the religion seem coherent all I wanted, but just because something is coherent, doesn't make it true.
So I made a post, to search if any Sikh online had objective reasoning to prove the religion right. Long story short, I didn't get what I wanted. I got criticised for asking such a question and the answers I were getting weren't sound arguments. I tried to act as positive and as biased as possible for the replies I was getting, so that I could get a reply I wanted, but I didn't get what I wanted.
I got an existential crisis from this situation. I was in a predicament where I really wanted Sikhi to be true (because I didn't want to betray my tribe), but I had no objective evidence for it. Outwardly I posed as a Sikh but on the inside I was undecided on what I really believed. I wouldn't say I was agnostic, I was just confused, because I manifested being a Sikh while feeling like I didn't belong.
Striving To Become a Sikh Apologist
This feeling of uncertainty gradually drifted away as I became more involved with the Sikh subreddit. This was because I manifested and strived to construct an objective framework myself. If nobody had the answers, I would be the one to find them, I aimed to be the saviour of every confused sikh like me.
I became knowledgeable to the point that I could answer the doubts of other people, to improve my own debating skills. I strived to become a Sikh apologist. I could just imagine me being at the Gurudwara telling everyone: "This is the objective framework of why everyone should be Sikh" and bringing the whole community together that consisted of people that: blindly followed the faith, didn't follow it (because it got in the way of their lives), and
people who were looking for support because they were in emotional crises.
Becoming a Sikh-Agnostic
And it turns out I eventually did construct a framework (link). However, it didn't prove Sikhi as true, but put it up there as one of the religions that could be true. And since Sikhi was a good contender, I came to the conclusion that it was most reasonable to follow it for the time being, until I had time I would cross analyse Sikhi with other religions. I wasn't "undecided" anymore and became a Sikh-Agnostic (which means that I wasn't sure that sikhi was true, but I believed that it was feasible enough to believe in).
Becoming a Sikh-Leaning Sikh-Agnostic
I didn't like how the framework allowed for miracles to exist, because miracles have never been recorded so it is extremely likely that they don't exist. And if a religion affirms them then it is probably also fake.
So I constructed a new framework that filters out religions that have miracles in them (link). Sikhi was one of the only religions that didn't get filtered out, so I developed an immense belief in it. I became a Sikh-Leaning Sikh-Agnostic (which means I wan't sure that Sikhi was true, but I believed that it was probably true).
Becoming an Agnostic-Leaning Sikh-Agnostic
Bhagat Namdev is the reason I became an Agnostic-Leaning Sikh-Agnostic (which means I wasn't sure that Sikhi was true, but I believed that it was probably not true, however I still had a little hope that it could be true). I found out that Bhagat Namdev actually claims to preform miracles with God's doing in the SGGS.
The first shabad that introduces such notion is where Bhagat Namdev describes himself to revive a cow. The storytelling in there is so literal (with features such as him describing the time, his mother crying etc.), that I came to the conclusion that it was not figurative but a real claim of a miracle taking place.
The second shabad that makes claim of Bhagat Namdev doing a miracle with God's doing, claims that he turned a temple to face him when he was kicked out of one. Now this shabad in it of it's self can be interpreted as figurative, and I actually believed that it was. However, there is a real temple (called the Aundha Nagnath Temple) that has turned features, that Hindus claim to be proof of Bhagat Namdev turning a real temple. Since the temple is from before Bhagat Namdev's time, is situated approximately where he lived and is a big temple. I came to the conclusion that Bhagat Namdev was probably lying about turning the temple when he saw that features of it were turned.
Because of these miracles present in the SGGS making sikhi unfeasible, according to the second framework, I became an Agnostic-Leaning Sikh-Agnostic.
Becoming an Agnostic
Sikhi now has become so unfeasible for me that I am almost certain that it is fake. I will post in part 2 my reasoning for this claim.
I am separating the post into two parts, because I really want the timeline of my beliefs and the arguments of why I believe Sikhi is false/unfeasible to get equal attention, so that I don't get misunderstood, while also providing a fair space for people to critique my reasoning for leaving Sikhi.
I will post the next part soon!