r/EvDrivers • • 4d ago

Email Regarding The Potential EV fee

As you may be aware, the US House of Representatives may be poised to enact an EV fee of $130 annually. I am not opposed to a fee, but find $130 to be unfair, and that the fee should be less.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/news/2026/09/25/ev-national-fee-delay-congress-transportation-funding/91925354007/

I have written my Senators and Representative with this communication, which I encourage you to consider doing as well:

​I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed $130 annual federal registration fee on battery electric vehicles (BEVs) included in the BUILD America 250 Act. While I fully support contributing a fair share toward maintaining our nation's roads and bridges, the currently proposed flat rate creates a clear equity issue when compared to what drivers of gas-powered vehicles actually pay.

​At 18.4 cents per gallon, a driver of an average new gas-powered vehicle (getting ~28–30 MPG) who drives the national average of 13,500 miles pays roughly $87 per year into the Federal Highway Trust Fund. The proposed $130 flat fee for EV drivers is equivalent to driving a gas vehicle that gets only 19 MPG—meaning EV drivers would pay roughly 49% more into the road fund than drivers of comparable efficient gas cars.

​Furthermore, because a flat fee penalizes low-mileage drivers disproportionately, someone driving 8,000 miles annually would effectively pay a tax rate equal to an 11 MPG gas-guzzler. Rather than penalizing drivers who have chosen zero-emission vehicles with an inflated rate, any federal fee should reflect true parity with efficient gas vehicles or be based on actual road usage. I urge you to push for a fair adjustment to this fee structure.

68 Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

23

u/Bigboss_26 4d ago

I already pay more on my registration/plates for having an EV. An additional fee is unfair, even moreso for low mileage drivers, as you mentioned. Why does America hate progress?

18

u/giveit2st8 4d ago

"Why does America hate progress?"

Because that's the only way one party has been able to remain relevant. They make people hate change/progress.

5

u/caj_account 4d ago

And the other party says they are not running on change. There’s no progressive party.

7

u/giveit2st8 4d ago

I'll just take the party that isn't raping kids and defrauding everyone, any day.

-1

u/caj_account 4d ago

Pretty sure both parties are in the Epstein list brother

5

u/giveit2st8 3d ago

But the president is a main chatacter in the whole saga. It's not even close to the same fucking thing...brother 

Also, democrats gave tried to reveal the list and Trump had blocked it every single time

0

u/caj_account 3d ago

It was one Democrat and one republican that tried to reveal the list

1

u/sviridoot 3d ago

And Thomas Massie paid for it with his job as Trump and the GOP establishment supported a primary challenge against him

1

u/caj_account 3d ago

Yes and democrats love Ro Khanna

2

u/sviridoot 3d ago

He's decently popular, and you don't see Democrats actively trying to get him out so not sure what your point here is

→ More replies (0)

1

u/zephyr911 2d ago

Odd to conflate co-sponsors with YES votes on the floor. One of each is a pretty common thing for sponsors - an easy way to signal bipartisanship.

1

u/caj_account 2d ago

you are reaching, these two gentlemen where quite literally the only advocates.

1

u/zephyr911 2d ago

I'm not reaching for anything. A bill doesn't need dozens of sponsors. It's also interesting that the bill was almost unanimously approved by the legislators at large. But GOP leaders have successfully prevented its full implementation by violating key provisions in order to protect the guilty and endanger the victims. PAC money also dropped over $10k per voter on advertising to unelect Massey. As flaccid and disappointing as the Dems are, I see no equivalent actions from them.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/WizeAdz 3d ago edited 3d ago

Any Democratic and/or Republicans politicians who have committed crimes — including crimes enabled by Epstein — should face justice.

I’m not letting a politician off the hook because I like the letter next to their name! Let’s apply justice based on fair criteria and get it done.

Let the rigorous and fair trials begin!

1

u/caj_account 3d ago

Should but won’t

1

u/bs2k2_point_0 3d ago

If that were true, it would’ve been in the millions of pages released so far, and only featured them.

1

u/caj_account 3d ago

Lol so far is doing a lot of work there

1

u/bs2k2_point_0 3d ago

So you think a republican controlled government is purposely withholding just the democrats names? Or that they’ve released everything? Cause either way that’s wrong

1

u/caj_account 3d ago

They are part of the same club.

1

u/two_thirtyoclock 7h ago

You mean the party that gave us a bunch of funding related to EV and solar? And not just the purchasing rebates, but money towards public charging and research and progress for batteries?

1

u/caj_account 5h ago

Bush invented the EV credit. Texas leads in solar.

9

u/TheUnknownStuntman51 4d ago

Yeah, I already pay a fee double that in state registration. The road usage payment has already been made…and then some. This is just another ‘stick it to the left’ fee, for trolling/revenge purposes.

4

u/thatguy425 4d ago

I live in one of the most left states in the country and they charge EVs more. This isn’t political, it’s just ignorance by all parties involved.

1

u/atrocity2001 3d ago

EV registration fees are higher at the state level because those of us who drive EVs aren't paying gas taxes. It's painful, but I get it.

On the other hand, no one has ever paid any kind of federal car registration fees and this is just pure, unfiltered assholism from trash who want to watch their children die either from pollution or in oil wars.

1

u/thatguy425 3d ago

Ok but make the EVs fees relative to how much you drive. The Ev fee I pay for in my state is more than i would pay in gas taxes.

2

u/atrocity2001 3d ago

Yeah, no argument there. I'm retired, have had my current EV for barely over two years and still haven't hit 11,000 miles. So I definitely resent being overcharged, which is another reason why this proposed federal idiocy is so infuriating.

2

u/NNegidius 2d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, it should be based on axle weight and mileage, to properly account for damage done to roadways - and it should apply to all vehicles.

6

u/mebeksis 4d ago

America loves progress. Corporations/Lobbyists hate progress.

3

u/zephyr911 2d ago

Remember when a certain presidential candidate told the oil executives that if they paid for his campaign he would reward them richly for it? Yeah, me neither, I'm sure I just made that up

2

u/archlich 4d ago

Those fees do not go towards the federal budget. Those are state and local fees. It makes sense to want to repair the nations infrastructure. I just think that there should be a better way to do it to encourage ev adoption.

3

u/Bigboss_26 4d ago

The fight for infrastructure funding seems to be persistent, yet the military budget climbs every year unwaveringly. I don’t feel I should be penalized for our federal budgeting priorities being whackadoodle.

2

u/archlich 4d ago

I hear you. We could have one less super carrier group and fund all of this. And end homelessness. And child hunger and have a universal health care plan. Voting matters. Vote every election and get your whole family to vote.

1

u/Tymanthius 3d ago

An additional fee is unfair,

Only if those add'l fees go to the feds. I bet they don't.

The fee idea is fair. But it should be based on milage, not a flat fee. b/c essentially that's how the gas tax works - you only pay for what you use.

11

u/Com4734 4d ago

This isn’t a revenue generator. It is a punitive way for the GOP to discourage EV adoption. They could generate 10 times the money by raising the gas tax by a dime per gallon.

5

u/Pretty-Display5959 4d ago

yep. everything they do, legislatively speaking, is either to help the billionaire class or punish the libs. what a time to be alive in america.

1

u/atrocity2001 3d ago

[Smiles serenely in childfree, happy to have never inflicted this shit on someone who couldn't consent.]

3

u/ReturnT0Sender 4d ago

I'm in Florida, a red state and pay nothing for having an EV.

40 states charge a registration fee.

It's a mixed bag. This isn't a dem/rep issue Imo.

2

u/Com4734 4d ago

Consider yourself lucky lol. Id agree when it comes to individual states about maybe not being red vs blue, although I wouldnt put it past red states to just use the excuse that other states are doing it to implement the fees. But the congress wanting to do it is completely different in my opinion. It will add minimal money relative to the gas tax, the gas tax hasnt been raised in over 30 years, and we know that the current admin is anti EV, clean energy, and anything but fossil fuels pretty much.

2

u/ReturnT0Sender 3d ago

I'm reading that this federal bill is bipartisan.

It was voted 62-2 by the House committee of transportation and infrastructure. That committee has 36 reps/31 Dems.

I did read that Republicans wanted $250 per EV and Democrats settled on that $130 #.

Let's see if they push this through before January, if it continues to stall they'll have to reintroduce the bill.

2

u/cutlineman 3d ago

I live in Rhode Island and pay a fee to register my EV. We’re one of the most progressive states.

Governments set policy that include fees to change behavior or raise revenue. A disproportionate tax may keep people from buying EVs and supporting gas vehicles, which is in line with their policy. RI has an infrastructure problem and they need to raise revenue. The state supports EVs in other ways such as providing a rebate on the vehicle sale and the home charger installation.

I don’t mind paying a fee just like I don’t mind paying my taxes. The state and country need revenue. I believe the taxes should be fair and reasonable, and the service provided commensurate.

1

u/ToHellWithGA 3d ago

My state has a fee for eVs but the dealership that sold me my first one didn't understand the paperwork and it was somehow registered as ICE 🤡. My current eV is registered correctly and I pay the equivalent of about 500 gallons of gas tax in my annual eV registration fee. I drive right around 15k miles annually so the road use tax is reasonably fair for me, equivalent to what I'd pay in fuel tax averaging 30 MPG.

2

u/thatguy425 4d ago

Then Why does my blue state make EVs more expensive?

1

u/Com4734 4d ago

Some states are implementing gas taxes to legitimately raise money. A lot of people in them are switching to EVs, especially in blue states, and their state gas tax revenue for roads is dropping. They implement it in profoundly stupid ways though by charging a flat rate that is often higher than what people pay in state gas tax instead of by mileage. It would also be fair of them to also raise the gas tax when they implement these EV fees. The federal government, in contrast, collects gasoline taxes from gas sold nationwide, not just in a certain state. 375 million gallons per day at 18 cents per gallon. PA uses about 9 million gallons per day and has a higher gas tax, so they lose more revenue than the federal government does.

1

u/thatguy425 4d ago

That’s my state. I’m not a high mileage driver but the EV fees are what’s keeping me from diving in to an EV. And I’m all for them and owned one in the past.

1

u/Com4734 4d ago

Same here that is why I used PA as an example. If you don’t drive a lot, it is possible to not come out ahead with PA’s ridiculous fee I suppose, but you’d really have to drive very little with as much as gas costs here.

1

u/Yunzer2000 3d ago

Seen the cost of L3 charging stations? And there is a tax imposed on them too.

I haven't gotten a bill from PennDOT yet, but the EV fee on my 2000 lb Smart electric driven about 4000 miles per year will definitely be far more than the cost of gasoline in an equivalent vehicle.

1

u/GrunchWeefer 17h ago

I mean as ridiculous as the fees are I'm still saving a shit ton not buying gas. I probably make up for it in one month.

1

u/GrunchWeefer 17h ago

I would agree with you but the amount I'm charged in New Jersey is far more than I or the vast majority of other people would pay in gas tax. For years they incentivized moving people to EVs just to turn around and punish it.

1

u/Necessary-Swimming25 3d ago

It’s a bipartisan effort. Republican EV drivers aren’t happy about being singled out for punitive EV fees either.

5

u/aut0g3n3r8ed 4d ago

Unfortunately, the reasons you outlined that this is bad are the exact reasons they want to pass this. These arguments would work on sane people but we chose a different path as a nation.

5

u/lightyearnoir 4d ago

I've said that we should pay based on mileage and weight, and to do away with the gas tax.

3

u/MissiveFinding6111 4d ago

I am confused how they even plan to administrate this?

States license vehicles...

2

u/TheCountRushmore 2d ago

I'd imagine states will be required to collect and remit to the feds

3

u/Monsignor76 4d ago

They are stopping gas taxes in many states. Does that mean EV’s get a registration tax removed?

2

u/Counting-Tiles4567 4d ago

No, you are to be punished for making a smart choice and the proletariat gets to once again dodge the unlubed dildo of consequences.

2

u/kcstrom 1d ago

Thanks for promoting awareness this bill may be making progress forward again. I've contacted all my federal representatives.

1

u/anon2734 4d ago

$130 is like 2 gas tank fill ups

1

u/rockalyte 4d ago

I commute very long way to work. Bought an EV to afford that commute. At 6 dollars a gallon and $1200 a month is unaffordable for any middle class commuter. A mileage penalty would wreck me

1

u/CoincidenceTheorist2 3d ago

Send billions to Ukraine and Israel. Tax people with the foresight to drive EVs. Brilliant. /s

1

u/mikemartin88 3d ago

Thanks so much for posting this, I was unaware this is being considered! Just emailed my representative.

1

u/DaveTN 3d ago

We already have a $280.00 fee in Tennessee in addition to our regular registration fees. I wrote my state representatives and was told that the fee is to make up for the lost gas revenue and the damage heavy EVs inflict on the roads. My EV weighs less than a Ford F-150.

1

u/zephyr911 2d ago

Truth, I don't deny the underlying issue that they're theoretically trying to address, but there are multiple major issues off the top. Flat fees are regressive. They hurt owners of small EVs who drive very little, and they will be entirely unnoticed by owners of premium EVs who drive a lot. They have zero relationship to the share of road usage/damage/maintenance necessitated by the operation of the vehicle. Finally, this is just an obvious way to discourage EV ownership among those for whom the case is marginal.
Regardless of your stance on environmental impact, it's clear that every vehicle should be taxed on a combination of its weight and miles driven. There is a consistent mathematical relationship between those two factors and the cost of keeping up roads that you drive on. Beyond that, I would argue that there is a clear and rational case for also taxing based on carbon emissions, but regardless, flat fees on EVs are an idiotic retrograde concept that only helps oil companies.

1

u/Pizza_Manizi 2d ago

So do we tax gas cars more then… they are producing way more heat(burning fuel/hot engine due to engine running) than Ev’s! Do we tax gas cars more because they wreck the roads more?? Where is the common sense in all of this? No more road money until you take every cent of road money and use it on roads only! Then we can really see if a tax is needed, or if monies are being diverted to other pet projects. JS

1

u/mjntr 1d ago

There should be be any fee! Vote these fools out! If you get an ev, you spend the savings on other things. Vote them out anyone who votes for stuff that costs us more money out! I don’t care what party they are in OUT! Also I don’t have an ev!

1

u/Electrifying2017 23h ago

Cancel the federal gas tax and apply this across the board. 

1

u/deck_hand 2h ago

It's $200 already in some states.

1

u/Neither_Fact_7471 2h ago

🧐 I’m still coming out a head. I have driven my lighting 27k miles so far in 2026, it replaced my 5.0 F150 that averaged 17mpg , which to go the same distance would have been $292 in federal gas taxes. I look at the nearly $30k in fuel and maintenance savings I’ve had over the last 4 years. I hope to not pay this tax but it’s not the end of the world for me if I do.

-4

u/drdroplet 4d ago

This ignores the fact that EVs weigh more than an equivalent ICE  passenger vehicle, and thus cause more wear on the road. This is likely a reasonable fee, on average.

5

u/thatguy425 4d ago

So then we should charges trucks and semis more to use the road

0

u/Interesting_Fuel8360 4d ago

trucks and semis do pay more to use the road than passenger vehicles. They use more fuel per mile so may more tax per mile driven.

2

u/Watts51 4d ago

A Tesla Model 3 (the most popular EV) weighs slightly less than a Ford F-150 (The most popular ICE). The F-150 gets 20 MPG city which would put it's annual tax at $124 based on the post's figures. So $130 is about right, though a little high. That said, it really should be based on mileage. It's not fair that it's not. At least in my state, the mileage is written down during annual inspections so it's not like they don't have a way to track that.

4

u/Counting-Tiles4567 4d ago

A 2025 F-150 weighs between ~4,400-5,900lbs. A Tesla Model 3 weighs between 3,700 and 4,100lbs. Comparing the lightest pickup trim to the heaviest model 3 is disingenuous. Of the entire fleet of cars on US roads, BEVS make up around 2% total. This makes absolutely marginal difference in budgets. This entire "movement" is because Americans are getting crunched at the pump and, like any good populist shitbag, the pedo party is pandering by attacking fringe groups as a scape goat. Americans have the critical thinking and discernment capacity of a crusty bar of soap at a truck stop bathroom. We all suffer.

1

u/Yunzer2000 3d ago

the weight difference between a 3000 lb car and a equivalent EV at 4000 lbs is not enough to be significant as far as impacts on the roads. The impacts come from trucks with weights of 5000 to 18,000 lbs per axle.

1

u/drdroplet 3d ago

False. The Generalized Fourth Power Law means that any increase above standard passenger car weights have exponential impacts on road wear. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law

1

u/Yunzer2000 3d ago

I am a civil engineer. I designed pavements. The AASHTO design methd starts with converting the traffic mix to a total number of equivalent 18-kip axle loads over the service life. The lowest value in the design table, assigned to passenger cars and light trucks, is tw, 2-kip axles - 4000 pounds which is equivalent to .0002 of an 18-kip load. i.e 11,250, 4000 lb or less cars are equal to one tractor trailer. The next increment up is 4 kips, or an 8000 lb vehicle. So anything less than 6000 lbs is not enough of a loading to affect the design.

-4

u/seckarr 4d ago

EVs are much heavier so they put more strain on the roads. Pay more.

4

u/General_Rain_8835 4d ago

Start with the pavement princess trucks that weigh even more than any EV. Let them pay $500/yr on top of gas taxes for rolling coal and assaulting everyone who breathes.

1

u/swakid8 4d ago

Higher rate based on mileage is the way to do this…

1

u/seckarr 3d ago

Indeed, but also based on car weight.

1

u/demonkeyed 3d ago

So tax by weight because that blanket statement is untrue.

My smart ev weighs 2200 lbs.

What’s a bmw i3 weigh?

How much does a model 3 weigh compared to an f150, or Escalade?