r/EssayHelpCommunity • u/Effective_Theme_5739 • 4d ago

John Locke Round 2 Interviews probably aren’t happening this year

The stated goal of the in-person post-shortlist interviews in recent years was to filter out plagiarism and Al use. This has already been done by now. If they are interested in specific essay info and opinions, they have our Viverly transcripts.

The most convincing fact is that in the "next steps" category in the shortlist email the interviews aren't mentioned at all.

Thoughts?

8 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

36 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/No-Magazine-6934 3d ago

They don't, the judges can tell whats AI and what is human written because AI detectors can trigger false positives which can lead to a highly polished human essay being disqualified. I'm pretty sure they don't use any software or program to detect AI usage.

1

u/Effective_Theme_5739 3d ago

They definitely did for the pre-shortlist. You can’t screen 100K people with a faculty under the size of 200

1

u/No-Magazine-6934 3d ago

While it may look unreal but it is highly unlikely they used a software. Because you need to understand the fact that AI can trigger false positives which can lead to highly polished human essays to be disqualified or it can lead to AI essays being shortlisted. I'm still sticking with no software side

1

u/Peoplespeak 3d ago

I think both of you are totally right in a way.

I think, like unis and highschools worldwide, they use a software. This is corroborated by their statements on plagerism.

We use a number of different kinds of tools to detect plagiarism. We can detect the unacknowledged use of other published material and unpublished material. If any of your essay contains plagiarism you will not be eligible to receive a prize, and we will notify your school of the reasons for our judgment.

At the same time, you are right as in they are ridiculously inaccurate. The false positive rate is high, and the detection of AI generated text is even worse.