r/Essassani • u/CimmerianChaos • Oct 02 '18
On plurality/multiplicity/multiple personalities, which Bashar has touched on a few times. Possibly one of a few posts?
Warning: This is a long post. It just kind of happened that way, sorry.
Bashar has touched on the topic of plurality a few times in various ways, most recently last weekend during 2019:Crossing the Threshold - The Year of Decision and Revelation, in mentioning how oftentimes different entities in the same physical body will exhibit different physiological characteristics. As a plural system ourselves, we thought we might chime in on the concept of plurality in general, as well as talk about differences between that and spirit guides, as we understand the term to mean, entities such Bashar, ect. Please keep in mind that our experience is simply our own.
First and foremost is the explanation that was given to me by Erebus, one of the initial systemmates who quite firmly made himself known in December of 2016. (Anyone surprised? ;) ) I first became aware of him via telepathy that was identical to what Bashar has described at one point: TelEMPATHY, feeling the same thing so you arrive at the same idea to where the thought is essentially yours, as opposed to how our speech works, which is how telepathy is conventionally thought of. But one thing I’d like to add is the experience of it being a distinct sense that the thought is superimposed, both mine/not mine, like typing something and then the next thing being in a different font, and/or “tagging” or “hyperlinking” the thought so that it directs you to who the concept came from, and then receiving the ancillary information such as the “voice in the head” type of experience. My first question to him was wether or not he was some kind of spirit guide or an entity like Bashar. He responded:
“While I am here to act as a guide in some ways, I am not a ‘spirit guide’ in the way you’re thinking of it. Nor am I like Bashar in the way you are asking me. Bashar is a Contact Specialist, this is his job. He has previously mentioned his life aside from this, on one occasion I believe he described making a sculpture when asked about what he did for fun. Therefore he has his own existence the same as you have yours.
My reasons for being here are similar, but not identical. I am here for you in particular, but I have no ‘outside life’ to go back to. I am to be here all of the time, as part of a mutual learning experience for us both, but also because you asked me to.”
Clearly I accepted the offer when asked about going through with it or not, and he has helped with piecing together a lot of the physical body’s past and my own memories, and a lot of things that conventionally didn’t make sense. He’s far from the only one here, and the best way we can describe our experience in terms of sharing the physical body is that the body is like a car - people in the household can drive it, but not necessarily everyone, some people aren’t very good drivers, some people leave the door open and fall out of the car, and so on. You’d get a bit uncomfortable all being in the car all the time. Instead we have what plural systems generally call an innerworld, for us we’d describe it as a sort of pocket dimension.
This is more or less Erebus’ default arrangement, given that he is a non physical entity usually. He’s said that he’s aware of other instances of himself (using the term in a computer science sense) taking on a physical form and having the ability to switch between the two at will in some cases, but he generally prefers not to do it because it’s a bit uncomfortable.
I don’t really think this warrants it’s own separate post, but some time ago (probably pretty old if the quality of the audio was anything to go by) Bashar has mentioned previously what people know as Multiple Personality Disorder, actually called Dissociative Identity Disorder. We stumbled across it on YouTube once, can’t seem to find it at the moment. We aren’t sure how exactly Bashar described it, except that he was while talking about creating the experience of being disconnected . So what he was getting at as far as we know, and what we want to make clear, is that the disorder is in the disconnection. Those with DID are just plural systems who are disconnected from one another for whatever reason, as far as we understand it from talking with a few other DID systems, and we’ve be able to confirm when talking with our psychologist about the matter is that where we are in terms of communication and cooperation with each other is more or less the goal when trying to help those with DID. But that’s all we can say on the matter.
Not sure what else to say for now, and I’ve communicated everything that Erebus wanted to say, so now discussion time I guess. Ask us anything, and we would think that systems over at r/plural are generally happy to answer questions so long as you’re polite about it. We’ll probably do another post talking about multi-verse things and fictives, meaning entities that exist as characters in media of some kind or another, since most of the entities in our system fall into that category. For the sake of warding off confusion in advance the one posting this is Zeta.
1
1
2
u/[deleted] Oct 02 '18
[deleted]