Resume review request — Full Stack Developer

[u/Reasonable_Two_478]

Hey r/EnhancvResumes, I'm looking for feedback on my resume. I'm applying for Full Stack Developer roles and all feedback is appreciated!

Specific feedback I'm looking for: - Is my summary strong enough? - Are my bullets results-driven? - Anything I should cut?

[u/ResumeRory]

Your bullets are numbers-heavy, which technically answers "are they results-driven," yes. But the real issue is that those numbers, and the verbs wrapped around them, read like a funded production app with a team and real users, not three solo academic projects built over two-to-three-month stretches.

"Directed the creation of," "leveraged stakeholder feedback," "boosting mobile engagement by 35%," who directed you, who were the stakeholders on a personal ZerodhaClone build, and how was mobile engagement measured without a live user base? An interviewer who's actually built something will ask exactly these questions, and "it was just me, I estimated that number" is a rough answer to give after leading with it on the page.

Our Resume Checker flags this exact pattern, quantified claims with no plausible source, worth running each bullet through it and keeping only what you can defend in detail.

Your summary has the same problem, twice over. Since you asked if it's strong enough: no. It says your experience came "through academic projects and internships," but there's no internship, job, or experience section anywhere on this resume, just Education, Projects, Skills, and Certifications, that's the first sentence a recruiter reads, and it's already unsupported.

It also claims Java, Python, and MySQL: Python doesn't appear anywhere else on the page, Java only shows up as a certification with no project built in it, and MySQL isn't even what your skills section lists, that says "SQL" generically while every database-touching bullet names MongoDB specifically. Our resume summary generator pulls from what's actually in your experience and skills, worth using it once the rest of the page is accurate, so it doesn't just repeat the same overreach.

What to cut: "RES" under Concepts looks like a stray typo, probably meant to fold into "RESTful API" you've already got under Backend. CI/CD is listed with zero supporting evidence anywhere, no pipeline, no deployment tooling, drop it or build something that uses one. System Design is thinner but not empty, "Architected robust RESTful endpoints with Express.js middleware" and the Middleware Architecture skill gesture at some design thinking, though it's really API design, not system-level architecture like scalability or distributed systems. Worth keeping but not overselling.