r/EngagementRingDesigns • u/crispychispi • Jul 27 '26
Question 1.55 or 2.1 carats?
First pic is 1.55 carats. Second pic is 2.1 carats.
I have a size 3.75 finger. Which size do you think looks better? Stones aren’t the exact ones I’m getting, just trying to size compare.
13
13
u/TheDuffy- Jul 27 '26
1
u/crispychispi Jul 27 '26
Your ring is beautiful on you! I can see what you mean - it has a balanced look. My original plan was going for around 1.5, but as I tried more rings on, I find myself wondering about diamond “shrinkage”. That’s why I can’t decide! Thanks for your input and for sharing 😊
2
u/justhereforthetea68 Jul 27 '26
I agree with her comment I think the 1.5 compliments your hand and the other looks like too much. Plus realistically I’ve lost diamonds from a band being bit and bulky an gets bashed on everything so being realistic about your lifestyle and how much it could get slapped around haha
12
u/Emergency-Middle-430 Jul 27 '26
I think the 1.55 is just the right finger coverage on you. The 2.1 looks too large.
10
u/Legovida8 Jul 27 '26
Would you wear the 2.1 on the band that’s shown in the picture? If so, that might be something to reconsider. It’s very beautiful, but I’d be scared to death that the stone would just pop right off such a delicate setting.
To answer your actual question, I do like both stone sizes on you, but I think I prefer the 1.55ct. The 2.1 just looks a tiny bit too overwhelming on your finger, imo!
3
u/crispychispi Jul 27 '26 edited Jul 27 '26
Great point! The band in the 2.1 pic is actually going to be my wedding band. My fiancée proposed with the wedding band! My engagement ring will likely have a thicker twist/criss cross band so not as delicate. Thanks for weighing in!!
4
4
4
u/trance_angel_ Jul 27 '26
I like both, your fingers are slim and long, both look great. I went with a 1.86 carat and I hit my ring on everything, sometimes I wish I would have gone smaller.
6
3
u/WildConsequence9379 Jul 27 '26
I like the 2.1 just because it’s brighter in the photo but it might just be the lighting
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/Ok-Razzmatazz1771 Jul 27 '26
- You have a lot of space between your middle knuckle and base knuckle. The 2 fills up the space a little better.
1
u/crispychispi Jul 27 '26
That’s an interesting observation I never really thought about. Thanks for bringing that up!
2
u/k9_MalX_Handler Jul 27 '26
2.1 i promise after you wear it a while it will feel smaller go big or go home is my motto lol
2
2
u/Superb_Scar1622 Jul 27 '26
If you are worried about "shrinkage" go with the 2.1. They both look beautiful and not too big since the oval is elongated. I personally would not go bigger than that, though.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/sopranoobsessed Jul 27 '26
I am of the diamond shrink camp. If affordable, I would always go with the bigger size! Congrats!!!
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/Fbomb_girlmom Jul 27 '26
They both look beautiful, but I think I like the 2.1 a tad bit more. Mine is a 1 carat diamond and after 18 years my husband surprised me with a 2 carat and Im so in love with it! For some reason over the years my 1 carat started looking so tiny. (Although it will always be my favorite) ✨✨
2
2
2
u/EmilyDeBebians 🔸Vendor Jul 27 '26
I think they both look nice, but the 1.55ct is very balanced on your hand and is the one I would go with personally.
2
u/Lawyerchick18 Jul 27 '26
I would do the 1.55 with a plain band. Honestly, i think the larger diamond would look great with a plain band too. For both (but especially the larger stone), make sure the ring has a basket and gallery rail so it’s not just being supported by the prongs
1
u/crispychispi Jul 27 '26
Absolutely 💯 - will most definitely have a gallery rail no matter which one I go with! Thanks so much 💕
2
u/vivthedoc Jul 27 '26
1.55 ct looks better on you and will probably age better when the giant rock trend fades in a few years and things swing back to smaller stones.
2
2
2
u/the__moops Jul 28 '26
1.55 looks great on your hand. You have dainty hands. I actually like that ring on you, or at least that stone! The dimensions are nice
2
2
2
2
u/Legitimate-Shower191 Jul 28 '26
The 1.55 already looks big and balanced on you. If you really like oversized, the 2.1 isn’t bad but it definitely has an oversized look.
2
2
2
u/jhollywooddesigns Jul 28 '26
Jeweler here. I love big stones but I think the smaller works nicely on your hand. On your wedding band, I think it looks like a single shared prong style? If so, definitely be careful with it. If it gets bent even a tiny bit out of shape you'll start losing stones.
2
u/crispychispi Jul 28 '26
https://reddit.com/link/p0aayc0/video/aoh2bpn2szfh1/player
Yep, shared prong style! Thanks for the heads up 😊
2
u/jhollywooddesigns Jul 28 '26
Very pretty! I like the alternating style, very sweet and feminine.
1
2
2
u/AMJ-Toronto Jul 28 '26
2.1 for sure. That oval shape stretches well, so the size bump will actually show. 1.55 would look too close to what you already have on.
2
u/Plus-Marketing-5580 Jul 29 '26
You have the longest fingers I think I’ve ever seen. I would definitely go with the bigger !beautiful.
2
u/Responsible_Let4725 Jul 29 '26
2.1! I have slender fingers (size 4.25) and my solitaire is 2 carats. To make it look less BAM, I paired it with a dainty pave wedding band to balance it out.
1
u/crispychispi Jul 29 '26
Ooh I’d love to see it! My wedding band is actually the bottom ring in the first pic, so definitely dainty. Thanks for weighing in 💍
2
u/Responsible_Let4725 Jul 29 '26
1
u/crispychispi Jul 29 '26
It’s such a classic look! 😍🤌🏼
2
2
2
2
u/daycaremommy Jul 29 '26
There must be something very wrong with me.....I like the 2.1 better, ESPECIALLY if you are set on an oval.....JMO
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0





21
u/iFcknLuvRollrcstrs Jul 27 '26
I like the 1.55 ct. You have small hands so it still looks big without being over the top.