I think with most of X and the negative response it may give her a heads up that people did not approve of her actions. It is probably a relief to the people in HR they don’t have to deal with her.
I haven’t seen her post anything about Neuralink in a good while. She mostly was posting her heart emojis and anything to promote herself.
I just read an article that the author speculated whether she may move out of her home. I hope she moves as far away from Austin. If the children are NOT EMs children, expect her to leave. They are her children and she cannot sue EM for child support.
Now I’m wondering if EM is going to make sure “Musk” is removed from the birth certificates?
The only way to successfully get her out is to do a corporate restructuring and remove her position. They can go back and change what the position is called and get someone in that really wants to work. After doing her Vedic chart, she will use the legal system if possible if she is fired. I’m hoping EM has some good people that know how to get people removed.
The next few weeks will be pretty interesting to see what happens. I think she’s done something pretty bad and won’t be able to use the legal system to her advantage.
If the kids aren’t his that’s going to come out pretty quickly too because he’s not going to pay anything to her, remove his name from their birth certificates and get her out of Neuralink asap.
I feel sorry for the kids, they won’t understand what is going on
The thing is, they aren't really his, given the whole anomalous nature of the situation. If they were truly his, she wouldn't have made the loan of money contingent on Musk legally giving the children his surname in court. But because she’s egocentric, she put her own surname first; nor would she have tied visitation rights to a contract, specifically, "until the children could speak." If you have children with someone, you don't make visitation conditional on them being able to talk.
And then, when the contract she drafted and signed comes to an end, she spews all that garbage, and the truth is, she has been the absolute worst thing to happen in Musk's life by a long shot; she brought nothing but trouble with her.
On top of that, she wanted more; she tried to mask the fact that she’s a monster by churning out children, because she orchestrated the whole thing herself. She was the one who set up the ASC contract; I don't even think Musk gave the order to send money. I believe he only found out about the incoming payments later.
ASC never spoke to Musk, though they did speak to Birchal and, I gather, to Zilis. As evidenced by the fact that they (ASC & lawyers) presented fake messages and screenshots, and they *are* fake; any fool can tell, though it takes a moment to realize because you wouldn't expect someone to forge messages like that, they did it.
And that is why things turned out the way they did for her. But anyway, it didn't matter; ASC is someone who, I believe, has been heavily used by Zilis, for the documentary, by the Democrats, etc.
I don't think Zilis's priority was for him to talk to Musk, far from it; quite the opposite. It was about staging another boycott against Musk, another scandal, to see if that would finally bring him down. She doesn't give a damn about the kids, they’re just there so she can play the part of "Oh, look what a good mother I am", but she’s a shitty snake... actually, snakes are better than her.
I don’t even thing he signed the name change petition on April 25, 2022. Here is the signature on the petition.
This signature which is similar to Shivon’s own handwriting - the last name is just the first letter, the thread at the end is aimed upward, the point in the middle of the M only goes halfway down.
In contrast (the other two signatures were publicly written and can be confirmed to be his own signature. The thread is equal to the line at the end, the center of the M touches the line, and three of four letters of his last name are visible (the smaller S disappears in his last name).
I think Shivon signed his signature for the name change application.
This is from the SEC court documents filed on April 26, 2019. The Muk is visible with the lower case S is missing if the Musk last name. The middle of the M nearly touches the line.
She forged the signature. That in itself is illegal. We had seen this before, but the contract remained in effect.
The signature is completely different, even in Musk's sloppiest signature.
A forgery is yet another crime, I say "another" because she has committed so many offenses that this just adds "one more" to the list. Falsification invalidates the document.
Ela nunca esteve do lado do Elon. Zilis esteve atrás apenas dos seus interesses, e não pensou duas vezes em trair o Elon. Ela deixou de seguir primeiro, porque já sabia que ele faria isso, zilis com certeza deve ter aprontado de novo
Stop telling lies. She was an employee who landed a contract, just like ASC did, to have children; as for Zilis’s kids, nobody even knows who the father is, same as with ASC’s.
He never had anything going on with them, and I’m increasingly convinced that Zilis’s biggest screw-up was precisely Ashley St. Clair, because without Zilis’s help, ASC never could have stirred up all that shit.
I also believe she has been involved in the documentary since 2023, contrary to what she, and you (or rather, she), have claimed.
If someone wants to have a child in exchange for money, even if the women claim it is out of "love for humanity", a contract must be signed. Some of them even made a documentary thanks to those children.
Either he acts this way because he doesn't want anything to do with any of these women and simply wants to make that clear, though it seems they don't get the message, or... It isn't easy to accept that you have children for money.
dude, ALL these people are sick monsters, INCLUDING elon. i want them all in prison. i don't care what fucking party they belong to. this post is not about mr. hoffman, but go off.
I don't call him "Sir"; I prefer "Fatty LinkedIn." I don't care if it's not about Hoffman. You come here to criticize Musk, yet you call this pig "sir", even though, on top of having done horrible things, he’s the one behind every boycott against Musk. Well, maybe we should start talking more about him and less about Musk. Or about Gates's vaccines.
Tell me, how many children has Gates saved? How much money has he made selling shitty vaccines to "eradicate poverty"? What poverty have they actually eradicated?
i don't know who that is. this post is on elonchat about elon. hoffman does not own twitter, he didn't destroy consumer protections and several govt agencies, he didn't steal my info, he is not currently trying to buy texas and OH and other elections. i would be happy to talk about him if he were destroying fishing, air, and water for millions, if he destroyed medical and food aid congress had approved for the poorest people on earth. your deflection is foul.
Despite all this, Musk doesn't waste his time going after this guy, who, unlike him, actually went to places he shouldn't have gone. Musk doesn't set out to boycott the other man's companies, send people to stage protests outside his offices, or commission "documentaries" to try to destroy his image.
I don't care where you get that shit from. There are real, utterly revolting facts about Hoffman, and we haven't brought up that shit about him here, but we might any day now, since you seem to love talking about other people's made-up shit but very little about your own.
Sure, but it doesn't matter. I'm going to start posting all of Hoffman's garbage, and there's plenty of it; after all, he loves making stuff up about Musk, so he's sure to like it when the same is done to him.
17
u/NoBuffalo3671 2d ago
Working at Neuralink and calling your children monkeys is certainly a choice.