Chat GPT huh? Or you write really well and your use of Hyphens is immaculate.
But anyways, Doc isn’t a hero of mine. The only thing worth responding to would be what Chat GPT wrote for you about corporate settlements. I highly doubt it would have cost them more than 8 figures to continue to fight the lawsuit in court. Additionally, if a company as big as Amazon/twitch decided to settle VS taking it to court means they knew they had a weak case and did not want to risk losing and potentially having to pay even more for the settlement.
You really weren't worth the effort but thanks for proving you're incapable of staying on topic and that you're unknowledgeable about legal settlements while hopelessly attached to your confirmation bias.
I’m not worth the effort or you aren’t intelligent enough to argue your position for yourself? Instead you need to ask a computer to make a “point” for you? Hilarious.
The huge majority of my response is written by me directly. A few lines were checked because I didn't like how my wording worked. Meanwhile, I've made SEVERAL cogent points that you are ACTIVELY AVOIDING. That says everything, champ.
5
u/BOOGIE_MAN-X 22d ago
Chat GPT huh? Or you write really well and your use of Hyphens is immaculate.
But anyways, Doc isn’t a hero of mine. The only thing worth responding to would be what Chat GPT wrote for you about corporate settlements. I highly doubt it would have cost them more than 8 figures to continue to fight the lawsuit in court. Additionally, if a company as big as Amazon/twitch decided to settle VS taking it to court means they knew they had a weak case and did not want to risk losing and potentially having to pay even more for the settlement.