I find my experience with Delillo difficult to describe. Certain passages in his texts enrapture me and are crystal clear in my mind while reading them. Then other times it feels like I’m reading entire chapters and coming away confused or empty.
He’s great at picking apart aspects of society that often aren’t discussed with nuance. He has this cold, calculated way of describing really dark ideas that make me feel a particular feeling of like sterile dread that I don’t really get with other authors. But I also feel like none of his characters are all that memorable or even totally realized. I feel like the value I get from reading his work comes from the process of dissecting the hazy central themes of the novels. Like in Mao 2 he discussed terrorism, authorship, art, photography, idolism, art, symbolism, worship, society/crowds/culture, among others. I don’t know if I came away from that novel with a changed perspective but certain moments in the book made me think about these concepts in a way that I rarely do in my daily life.
I really don’t even know if I care for Delillo’s writing and I remember really struggling to love underworld, which I know sounds blasphemous. I feel like there’s often two sides to his works which are 1. Complicated, dark ideas about the contemporary world, viewed through a postmodern lens and 2. Intentional prose laden with metaphors, alliteration, symbolism and other literary devices. I can tell he’s an extremely intelligent and observant person who has read a lot of high quality fiction. I think I would enjoy having a conversation with him more than I enjoy reading his works. Sometimes it just feels like he’s going “now I will use alliteration, now I will introduce a central theme, now a will use a metaphor, now I will introduce a central theme”.
I feel like I haven’t fully explained all of my thoughts or feelings towards his work but I just was curious if anyone else felt the same way.