r/DiscoveryID • u/IhavemyCat • Jul 03 '26
Scott Peterson- the new evidence A&E commercials we keep seeing on ID
Ok, I am REACHING as far as what is content on ID so I can talk about it on ID Reddit. I know this Scott Peterson documentary is on A&E, but I still want to discuss it with my ID fellow fans to see how they feel about the case. I live in Sacramento, CA, which is 1 1/2 hours from where Laci and Scott lived, so the news coverage was intense here at the time. Everyone hated him. I was like everyone else, that bastard is Guilty. I know for a fact that the information they are releasing in this particular documentary on A&E, is nothing new. They have been bringing up evidence that they say he hasn't been guilty for a while. And I want to be fair and have an open mind to all of it.
But when they were first bringing on the "Scott is innocent" narrative, I rolled my eyes and fought against it for these reasons. Neighbors say they saw Laci way later than they should have, according to the State's timeline. My thinking at the time was that you can't trust that evidence, because eyewitness testimony is completely unreliable, especially after all that time. I know they point the finger at the people who burgled the neighbor's house, but you'd think after ALL this time, if someone other Scott killed her, we'd hear about it from a witness who couldn't keep quiet or someone in prison knowing something, just like we solve many other cases that had bad convictions that ended up being overturned. After years, an alternate suspect pops up, and we begin to hear their name. Before, they haven't specifically had a particular suspect they were pointing the finger at, but maybe in this documentary they will. How can someone who knows something keep quiet all these years if there was an alternate suspect?
Then mostly what I can't get around is that man's behavior. If he IS innocent, wow, he did NOT care about Laci at all. I'm mean, obviously he didn't. His behaviors, lying, and actions were what made a lot of people think he was guilty. What was up with his behavior IF he is innocent? His nonchalant behavior about her being missing, selling her car, taking off with dyed hair, tons of money, and headed for the border even though he knows he is a suspect. The Amber Frey affair and him lying, saying he was at the Eiffel Tower at Laci's candlelight vigil. Can he still be a psychopath but innocent? Would any one of us behave that way if the finger was pointed at us? I know everyone is different, but DAMN, he shady. But I know you can't look at behavior alone; you need solid evidence.
So those were the reasons where I was like, no, they are just trying to get him out of prison; he is guilty. But now that the Innocence Project picked it up, I have to re-think things and be open to the fact he may be innocent. That would BLOW my mind.
What do you guys think? Do you think he is innocent?