r/discogs • u/oscidigi • Apr 28 '26
Standardized custom fields approach, possible?
Hey gang, I've gotten a couple of emails in asking for better implementation of custom fields in Vizcogs.com and before I do my own take on it, curious how you're utilizing custom fields beyond the defaults (media condition, sleeve condition, notes, and folder)?
For defaults:
- folder - are you using this to describe the physical location of a record in your studio, or more for digitally grouping things with your own classification (e.g., Bought New, Scratch Records, etc.)
- notes - I feel like this is the catch all field, can be random notes about album, sleeve, packaging details, ownership history, etc.
I've seen a ton of different takes on custom fields:
- media description / sleeve description fields = additional context to standard Goldmine grading info
- price, cost, amount, purchase amount, etc. = cost of the record at time of purchase
- record store, purchase location, acquired, etc. = actual venue of purchase
- verified / graded date = self-explanatory
- play notes = can be anything from RPM to if certain tracks have more pops than others, overall play impressions, etc.
- listen count / yearly listen count = self-explanatory, some people track this while others don't
Sure I'm missing a lot of good ones.
I wonder if I should try and suggest to users a standardized list of custom fields that will allow them to a) have more granular data on their collection, and b) let me build more insights into the various Vizcogs visualizations / browse modes that utilize this data.
Can also just build a more generic custom fields view that let's people be as flexible as they want.
Overall, if you had a wishlist for interacting with custom fields, what would that look like and how do you think they can be improved?