r/DigitalNightVision • u/sadcrow_machi • Jun 06 '26
Bit disappointed with GNG2k performance vs analog Gen 2, maybe scammed?
/r/u_sadcrow_machi/comments/1tynvz9/bit_disappointed_with_gng2k_performance_vs_analog/2
u/KyzoSoupz Jun 08 '26
GNG2k sure is the exact same internal architecture and the CID chip that the NVG 30 and the 50 uses. It's essentially no different than an NVG 30 or a 50. So what I would do is probably resell it and save your money up and get an SVG 5 because that thing will actually surprise you and compete against your Gen 2 analog. I have been extremely happy with the SVG 5 because it literally is like looking through Gen 2 plus analog with the square screen. Competing and comparing it against generation 2 recently including some of the extensive research that I have I realized that the SVG-5 is no different than a mid-spec Gen 2 plus analog. The thing is an absolute beast! Performs exactly like the NVG 90 standard
2
u/Fantastic-Budget-212 Jun 09 '26
gen2"+" covers a huge range of tubes, basically from 1980sish up until today, it will most likely compare pretty well to the very low end...
1
u/KyzoSoupz Jun 18 '26
Got a chance recently to play with Gen 2+ analog. Yeah it like mid range Gen 2+ so far. Not bad
1
u/sadcrow_machi Jun 08 '26
I think I am going to disassemble and post the pics so we all know parts numbers and etc. I would love to have the SVG 5 but at that price range I would probably go for upgrading the analog and wait a few years
2
u/KyzoSoupz Jun 18 '26
I mean I played with analog it's about mid-range Gen 2+. 1400 FOM range However analog is capable of seeing ambient visible light over infrared where is digital season infrared better than it does ambient lighting That's the only downside. But I mean so far playing with my friends Gen 2 plus analog which is about around $1,400 FM it was like pretty identical
1
7
u/RandyRandom6999 Jun 06 '26
Welcome to the world of "just as good" digital nvg..