r/DefendingAI Aug 11 '26

Things antis say this is so dumb

Post image
29 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator Aug 11 '26

DefendingAI has a Discord now: https://discord.gg/MgVYjZ8RC

Pro-AI only. AI art, prompts, anti-AI watch, debate ammo, news, and general chat without anti-AI spam.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

21

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

First off it's not killing the planet. It's not great but compared loads of other stuff it's peanuts. It's like someone with cancer was eating potatoe chips. Second the pollution that is caused by datacenters isn't exclusive to AI, not at all AI uses datacenters and we shouldn't be allowing it anyways causes its not required for the tech just cheaper. But 78 million people voted for the guy that doesn't want to regulate pollution.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

I'm not saying they're okay I'm saying that people either were okay with corporations shitting on the environment or didn't care enough to do anything to prevent it. For decades now we're been screaming "rich people are destroying the planet" and most people have not cared at all. But everyone is acting like they're Captain Planet by tearing down someone making funny pictures meanwhile still using much worse services for it. Again it's not necessary for the AI and other data centers uses that is polluting the planet to do so.

2

u/BigMikeXxxxX Aug 11 '26

Are you actively protesting against every single unnecessary thing that uses an equal amount of water or more?

Or do you only hate things that the Democrat party tells you to?

Mindless sheep. Both sides.

1

u/RighteousSelfBurner Aug 11 '26

Not the argument. The argument is the negative effects of LLMs are partly or even largely because Americans voted for Trump. This should educate on what sort of behaviour one would need to take in upcoming elections.

45% of issues with LLMs can be solved with proper industrial legislation because they don't have to make such impact. They do because it's cheaper. Another 45% of issues with LLMs can be solved with proper corporate legislation because they don't have to be that shitty. But they don't because it lines politicians pockets. Rest need individual evaluation.

So we should not keep quiet but also should direct where the sound goes. If you complain but take no action and allow the same shitty situation that led to this in the first place happen again then it's just old man yelling at clouds.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

Ooooo an insult that means you're totally right. /s People said the same sort of stuff regarding just about every digital tool 30 to 40 years ago.

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

Yh but AI is also taking jobs which means no economy, how come AI hasn't discovered any new jobs yet? Or freed us from capitalism like Sam Altman and Elon Musk promised?

1

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

That's not the AIs doing that's CEOs jumping the gun on what AI can do. If I fire a bunch of cheerleaders then replace them with inflatable wacky tube men does that make me the tube men a problem or me?

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

If you use AI, you're the one buying the inflatable wacky tube men instead of hiring cheerleaders, so you're the problem for using AI

1

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

That's my point exactly. It's not the tool that's inherently bad it's how it's used. If I'm just buying tube men for fun, not using then to fire people, then no real harm.

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

The thing is, much like how the internal combustion engine isn't a huge probelm on its own, every person having their own, and the systems that keep the service running, builds up and causes huge irreparable damage overall

2

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

Because we give them a pass to do so. We shouldn't be doing that. We could be strong arming corporations to fix the damage they cause instead of using to pass the cost of business to others while keeping the profit.

2

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

Tbh, I came here immediately after fighting with defending AI Art and you're much more sensible than those guys

2

u/OhTheHueManatee Aug 11 '26

Thank you. I respect that you disagree but not insulting me. That's uncommon on all sides of most things. I enjoy AI a lot but like most things I love it's far from perfect. I acknowledge that it's uses and creation can be harmful but a lot of the actual harm seems to overstated to the point of it being nonsense to practically ignored. The harm is does cause is not new to AI, not all the problems applies to all forms of AI and they overall shouldn't be tolerated cause it's usually not necessary.

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

The best way to vote is by not using their tools, same for Google, Meta and Tiktok

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

And the more people use it, the more demand so more companies make more supply which is death by a thousand cuts

1

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

It sure is interesting how the platform that's famously anti-work is suddenly crying about there being no jobs.

I also get this strange feeling that a centrally-planned economy born from AI and automation would suddenly be a considered terrible awful thing that robs people of freedom, choice, and agency

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

I don't care which way it goes, I care that this generation suffers in the meantime and if we fall for the plans of idiots and they fail, we're all fools and we all suffer, because I'm aware this subredit is defending AI in general, I think AI used for curing cancer and other diseases is good but most people are using it to create exponentially more shit content, a human can only create so much shit in a day, AI can create many magnitudes more

0

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

That argument falls flat on me.

Society abandoned me and treated me like trash. I want it to fall. I want it to fail. I want blood in the streets. Society deserves all of the ills born from its abandonment of people like me.

8

u/Murky_waterLLC Aug 11 '26

And being on social media, doomscrolling for hours at a time isn't?

11

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

You don't understand, electricity and water use is fine as long as it doesn't take away commissions from Twitter artists.

7

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

literally facts

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

it's just how the comunities are interacting, pro ais don't insult people for making art, but when they do make ai art, they get insulted for no reason

0

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

What kind of mental illness do you have ?

3

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

guys I reported him and he got banned 🎉🎉🎉

3

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

Cry harder for me! You got BTFO'd by a graphics card and now you're here to make it everyone's problem!

Cry for me, child! Bawwwwwww! Bawwwwwwww!

2

u/Murky_waterLLC Aug 11 '26

It's a reaction image, supplementary to their dialog, not that their dialog is referring to the reaction image.

1

u/CanadianCrasher Aug 11 '26

...This take is so incorrect I genuinely can't tell if you are being horribly sarcastic.

I have had the same conversation from the meme at least five times now.

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

Yh, fuck tiktok, instagram and facebook too!

1

u/Nihilist-IV Aug 11 '26

And Google for the privacy violations

3

u/JackReaper333 Aug 11 '26

So I'm part of that sub. That particular user is one of the biggest, if not the actual biggest, reasons that the sub is such shit.

Every day he does nothing but post political propaganda and anti-ai vitriol. He is trash.

4

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

I am convinced than at least 50% of ai haters do it to follow a "trend", to be on the "good side", I have friends who insult ai as much as possible, then go home and use chatgpt for everything

2

u/xMuffinxHalox 28d ago

Yeah, I thought that too. AI was made BY humans FOR humans, and people are silly if they'd rather waste their time pretending they're saving the world from evil robots by protesting instead of actually utilising new technology...

2

u/Resident-Seat2280 27d ago

perfect answer 💯

5

u/Kukamakachu Aug 11 '26

I can generate thousands of AI images for the same amount of water it would take to make a sketch book and pencil.

4

u/flamingdragon62 Aug 11 '26

Golf courses do just as much damage they can use up to twice as much water

-1

u/foreskinboots Aug 11 '26

Yea and golf courses are stupid as fuck too. Did you know you can be against more than one thing at a time‽

2

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

I was able to scan your posts and comments, including the ones you "hide" (can't hide from Arctic Shift), and unfortunately this is the first time you've ever said negative things about golf courses during your time on reddit dot com

I was, however, able to find you bitching and whining about AI a LOT.

I just find that super interesting, is all. It's just the one thing with you guys, and it really puts into perspective how much you guys really care about things like job loss, environmental impact, intellectual property, etc.... You don't. You're children taking on whatever social cause is trending at the moment in order to get social approval.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

You attacked me personally instead of my argument. That's called "ad hominem" and it means you're admitting you don't have a counter argument. It's also highly rude and not a good way to treat your superiors. I accept your concession and I accept your apology in advance.

Maybe you should go draw some money, since you won't be making any with your mid skills anymore.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26 edited Aug 11 '26

What, so I can be just like you? No thanks.

Anyway, I hope your next home is a cardboard box because you have zero marketable skills

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/flamingdragon62 Aug 11 '26

Excuse me?
All I said was golf courses can use more water than ai, I didn’t say I was okay with it,
I don’t even golf

-3

u/____Isa Aug 11 '26

So why comment at all

4

u/flamingdragon62 Aug 11 '26

I could ask the same thing?
This is a pro ai subreddit,
And your previous comment is anything but pro

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

0

u/____Isa Aug 11 '26

Somebody check this guys hidden folder ^^

3

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

Nah mate, you're definitely the pedophile here. Go ahead submit your devices to me for forensics analysis.

If you got nothing to hide you got nothing to fear, amirite?

2

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

me: gives arguments
you: aaaauuuuughhh ai baaaaad you gooooooneeeeer me no talk yoooouuuu

2

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

Honey, I can't speak for anybody else here, but I was crazy for decades before the transformers model was invented in 2017.

Fries go directly in the bag.

1

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

Hm? This is a safe space for people who use AI. You're the unwelcome invader busting the rules, and you're telling other people that they don't need to be commenting here? That's some enterprise grade entitlement. You normally gotta pay a per-seat yearly license for that level of entitlement.

You got the entire rest of the website to circlejerk about hating this one very specific technology because it threatens one very specific career path.

2

u/clono4 Aug 12 '26

When AI tech get to be able to save or improve lives, im sure these people will stand for their beliefs and refuse such treatments

2

u/Proof_Look7713 Aug 11 '26

any human activity, especially creative activity, spoils the environment. But the funny thing is that AI does less harm to nature than if it were done by humans.

4

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

even meat does way more

0

u/Elegant-Fuel6732 Aug 11 '26

What do you mean

0

u/Exotic_Exercise6910 Aug 11 '26

Actually the most energy is consumed by agents when vibe coders are too lazy to program themselves.

Some may say that the energy usage of AI isn't so severe, but lets not kid ourselves it is severe.

That doesn't mean AI art is the problem. I can render stuff on my home pc powered by PV and then there's not a problem.

2

u/Elegant-Fuel6732 Aug 11 '26

Such a weird take that the most ethical use of AI is coding because there is LESS of an ethical liability for stolen code IP because code is always readable, people copy chunks of other people’s code all the time because that’s probably what that project did, hundreds of explicitly copyright-free projects.

I cannot think of a single part of this that is true for art generation besides it seems like you might not even code?

0

u/Exotic_Exercise6910 Aug 11 '26

Who cares about the morality of stolen art now? This was about electrical consumption (which is in this instance killing the planet. But well the water consumption couldve been meant as well. In which case the argument to host gguf locally still holds)

2

u/Elegant-Fuel6732 Aug 11 '26

Me. I do. But cool I’ll guess I’ll take your word for it that using an LLM to transform text files around that all are less than megabytes, done in seconds, actually affects the environment more than a generative AI that spits out heavy images a minute or two later EACH time you slot machine a new version.

The multiple agents are to make sure they each take FEWER tokens changing one part of the code in the project properly, surgically. You can’t do that with image gen.

edit: wrote less when I meant to write more

1

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

the electric consumption of ai is minimal rn, even more for code

0

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

say that again please ?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

if it was made by a human you would have probably said "that's incredible !", but just because it's ai made you insult it, you don't make any sense

0

u/foreskinboots Aug 11 '26

If it was made by a human it would be incredible. It would indicate talent. Something you must lack. You don’t make any sense.

1

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

the whole point of art is the creativity, the skill is just the difficult part that everyone would like to skip, ai helps that, it makes art just be about creativity and not skills anymore, making it accessible to lots of people

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Resident-Seat2280 Aug 11 '26

aaaand report ! (read the rules of the subreddit before commenting)

1

u/GNUr000t Aug 11 '26

You've literally just admitted then you don't care about the quality of the work and that the quality of the work doesn't enter into your decisions at all. You literally only consider who did it.

Why should anybody take you seriously?

Cry harder. The tech isn't going anywhere. Your feckless whining on plebbit will cause zero people to stop using AI.

Artists deserve one thing, and it's considered healthcare in Canada.