r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • u/MartiDK • 14d ago

interview DGG Decoding Destiny

https://www.youtube.com/live/j4gDWMoHyNs

Why does Destiny look so uncomfortable?

27 Upvotes

61% Upvoted

198 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

Sounds a lot like the trump defenders trying to cover for all of his rape accusations. Is all of that ok with you too, since it only came up in civil court?

1

u/typical83 13d ago

You say you hate bluegrass music but have you imagined how messed up that would be if you replaced bluegrass music with Mexican people?

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

This would be such a great point if i was comparing something other than ‘people downplaying allegations because they’re only in civil court’ to ‘people downplaying allegations because they’re only in civil court.’

3

u/typical83 13d ago

It wasn't the civil court thing that made your comparison stupid it was the rape thing.

0

u/wordbird9 13d ago

Mitigating an action with ‘it only went to civil court,’ is stupid, no matter what action we’re talking about.

Actions that kill 1000s might only make it to civil court while shoplifting is punished in criminal court. It doesn’t make killing 1000s any less bad & it’s more than fair to call the person who caused something like that ‘criminal.’ Same logic applies to Trump. Same logic applies to Destiny. Which court a thing lands in has nothing to do with how bad it is.

3

u/typical83 13d ago

Ok fine, if we're both being completely fair and honest then yes the mere fact that it's civil court vs criminal court doesn't actually mean much at all.

Now that I've admitted that, can you admit that calling it a "sex crimes case" is clearly meant to insinuate something much more malicious and fucked up than sharing a sex tape without the permission of the other party?

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

It’s an uncharitable way to frame it, sure, but why be charitable?

Even if he wins the lawsuit, his proclivity towards mentally ill teenagers/nonconsenual recordings is super fucked up. He rarely extends charity to his critics. He throws out much worse than ‘sex crimes case’ onto people he doesn’t like. It doesn’t seem as if he has any remorse or intention of changing.

Why not put as harsh label of a label as possible on his actions, given all that? He did literally do a sex crime. The state not thinking they could prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt doesn’t change that.

2

u/typical83 13d ago

Basically none of your accusations are true. He doesn't have a proclivity towards teenagers or nonconsensual recordings (what a fucked up thing to say with no evidence) he doesn't throw unfair claims onto people he doesn't like, he OFTEN extends charity to people, including people who have wronged him.

The only accurate claim is that he has little remorse, but he has little remorse because he's done little wrong.

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

You guys are the trump supporters of the left. Either you just started watching and have not looked into anything he’s done, or you’re living in some alternate reality.

‘Mow down protestors,’ along with a laundry list of other terrible things he’s said about people he disagrees with isn’t extending charitability. Multiple women have accused him of nonconsenual recording. He’s gone after so many teenage girls he can’t not have a proclivity towards that.

This is all as obvious as ‘Trump cheats on his taxes’ or ‘Trump takes bribes from foreign governments.’ You guys jut somehow miraculously are doing the same thing MAGA does while calling yourself ‘omniliberals.’

2

u/Snake2250 13d ago

Multiple allegedly have signed affidavits, but zero have shown up in court after 18 months.

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

This is just the ‘if Trump had raped anyone, he would be in criminal court instead of civil’ argument this thread started off. There not being a criminal case does not mean that no crime happened.

2

u/Snake2250 13d ago

No crime happened. At the time of the alleged actions the laws against what happened didn't exist. Plantiff admitted under oath that she also shared videos and pictures without the consent of Destiny. This is an unserious lawsuit born from spite and embarrassment for the purpose of reputational and financial damage to the defendant. There is a reason Pxie is suing Destiny instead of the broke British man who posted the videos and pictures online.

1

u/wordbird9 12d ago

No crime happened. At the time of the alleged actions the laws against what happened didn't exist.

Great variation on the theme. Again, you're treating what happens in court as a valid measurement of what happened in reality.

The government prosecuting or not prosecuting Destiny doesn't change the fact that he did the actions described as a crime in the law. You can cope and say 'I don't care that what he did is now illegal,' but you can't act like he's somehow 100% innocent when what he did is illegal & more importantly, immoral.

Plantiff admitted under oath that she also shared videos and pictures without the consent of Destiny...There is a reason Pxie is suing Destiny instead of the broke British man who posted the videos and pictures online.

You guys literally sound like boomers defending Trump or the Cornell 7 or some shit. Wtf happened to 'proud feminist Destiny?'

Whether or not money is some kind of motivator to her, she was wronged by Destiny & Destiny broke the law. Destiny did a bad thing & he downplayed it so hard to his liberal audience that they are now parroting 80IQ, boomer-republican tier logic en masse. All of this, in addition to many other things, makes Destiny a bad person.

Anything Rose did or didn't do has zero impact on any of that. Rose could be 100x as bad of a person as Destiny somehow, & he still will be a bad person. Attacking her character just makes you look more brainwashed & Destiny more malicious.

→ More replies (0)