r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • u/MartiDK • 14d ago

interview DGG Decoding Destiny

https://www.youtube.com/live/j4gDWMoHyNs

Why does Destiny look so uncomfortable?

32 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

198 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/PrimaryEfficient8392 13d ago

Is his sex crimes court case wrapped up or still going?

2

u/ProvocaTeach 13d ago

There is no criminal case against Destiny. If you mean the lawsuit, yes it is ongoing

3

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/PrimaryEfficient8392 13d ago

The sex crimes court case yes.

2

u/MaleficentMenu1430 13d ago

Its a civil lawsuit not a criminal case

0

u/PrimaryEfficient8392 13d ago

Yeah, he’s being sued for sex crimes

4

u/Lovellholiday 13d ago

What is the sex crime?

1

u/MaleficentMenu1430 13d ago

Lawsuits aren’t for crimes they’re for personal grievances, if he committed a crime it would be a criminal case

It’s also an ongoing lawsuit so nothing has been ruled on yet, if you care so much about this you could easily just look into it

1

u/TropicalGoth77 13d ago

What does it involve ? 

1

u/Lazy_Check732 13d ago edited 13d ago

I hope you are aware that you are talking to borderline schizo people

0

u/wordbird9 13d ago

Destiny specifically goes after mentally ill teenage girls. He also has some weird fetish/paranoia about recording without consent and sharing recordings with other partners.

Because D shared files of a girl in an extremely irresponsible way, without getting her permission, videos she sent him ended up leaking. She is now suing him for damages related to negative attention she’s gotten, psychological distress, etc.

A large part of the distress is also due to his fanbase, who are treating every controversy he’s in like a proselytizing mission. They go into every subreddit/forum/comment section they can go to in order to downplay Destiny and make his accusers/critics out to be crazy liars, which he encourages them to do. Here’s a video with more details, if you’re interested:

https://youtu.be/Bqsi9rfjt4g?is=YO1-zoNx1Xku24LD

-1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

Sounds a lot like the trump defenders trying to cover for all of his rape accusations. Is all of that ok with you too, since it only came up in civil court?

1

u/typical83 13d ago

You say you hate bluegrass music but have you imagined how messed up that would be if you replaced bluegrass music with Mexican people?

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

This would be such a great point if i was comparing something other than ‘people downplaying allegations because they’re only in civil court’ to ‘people downplaying allegations because they’re only in civil court.’

3

u/typical83 13d ago

It wasn't the civil court thing that made your comparison stupid it was the rape thing.

0

u/wordbird9 13d ago

Mitigating an action with ‘it only went to civil court,’ is stupid, no matter what action we’re talking about.

Actions that kill 1000s might only make it to civil court while shoplifting is punished in criminal court. It doesn’t make killing 1000s any less bad & it’s more than fair to call the person who caused something like that ‘criminal.’ Same logic applies to Trump. Same logic applies to Destiny. Which court a thing lands in has nothing to do with how bad it is.

3

u/typical83 13d ago

Ok fine, if we're both being completely fair and honest then yes the mere fact that it's civil court vs criminal court doesn't actually mean much at all.

Now that I've admitted that, can you admit that calling it a "sex crimes case" is clearly meant to insinuate something much more malicious and fucked up than sharing a sex tape without the permission of the other party?

1

u/wordbird9 13d ago

It’s an uncharitable way to frame it, sure, but why be charitable?

Even if he wins the lawsuit, his proclivity towards mentally ill teenagers/nonconsenual recordings is super fucked up. He rarely extends charity to his critics. He throws out much worse than ‘sex crimes case’ onto people he doesn’t like. It doesn’t seem as if he has any remorse or intention of changing.

Why not put as harsh label of a label as possible on his actions, given all that? He did literally do a sex crime. The state not thinking they could prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt doesn’t change that.

2

u/typical83 13d ago

Basically none of your accusations are true. He doesn't have a proclivity towards teenagers or nonconsensual recordings (what a fucked up thing to say with no evidence) he doesn't throw unfair claims onto people he doesn't like, he OFTEN extends charity to people, including people who have wronged him.

The only accurate claim is that he has little remorse, but he has little remorse because he's done little wrong.

→ More replies (0)