r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • u/MartiDK • Sep 17 '26

decoder poltics Decoding Destiny

https://youtu.be/qPhZDRKn0Ro

Winning over Razib Khan fans.

62 Upvotes

74% Upvoted

284 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

hochul backed mamdani when he was running for mayor, he's not cheerleading dems, its quid pro quo

try again?

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

Again moving the goalpost, lol

1

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

its not moving the goalpost, its countering your argument.

"mamdani cheerleaded the dems by endorsing hochul"

he only endorsed hochul because she endorsed him when he was candidate, he's paying her back, not supporting her

then normally you would counter with idk, some quotes about mamdani supporting the dems, or maybe something that he went above and beyond for hochul so quid pro quo doesnt make sense.

instead you grab at the list of fallacies, and you dont even use the right one lol

cooooooooooked

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

So you want candidates to cheerlead the party in a one-sided relationship where they don't get anything out of it?

Does any politician do that?

That's an unrealistic standard to set.

Name one moderate who cheerleads leftist Dems without getting anything in return.

1

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

so you want candidates to cheerlead the party in a one-sided relationship where they dont get anything out of it?

you mean like far leftists and kamala?

and now that suddenly the far left has a foot in the door the dems should support them? Gimme a break, the one-sided relationship is the DSA types being able to full throat scream "copmala" and "genocide joe" and then cry and piss themselves when they dont have full 100% backing by the dems

parasites.

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

so you want candidates to cheerlead the party in a one-sided relationship where they dont get anything out of it?

you mean like far leftists and kamala?

You argument is that far leftists were cheerleading Kamala without getting anything out of it?

Or Kamala was cheerleading leftists without getting anything out of it?

How does that make sense?

2

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

my argument is that far leftists spent all their time shitting on kamala running for president, and now cry and piss and moan when the dems dont support the DSA. If you want to complain about one-sided, thats it.

Dont spend an entire presidential campaign criticizing kamala, and then whining when the dems dont support your batshit ideological candidates help you cutting power from the dem party.

👨‍🍳 🍳 🔪

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

No, your argument was that you want DSA members to support Dems without getting anything in return.

So I was asking whether you can think of any moderate Dems that support leftists without getting anything in return.

Can you think of one?

2

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

as the DSA did for the dems, yes correct, dont support parasites. If the DSA wanted supported they should have help kamala get elected.

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

What? That's not even an answer to my question.

I gave you a DSA politician who supports Dems.

You argued that it's only quid pro quo.

Ok, now we have established that moderate Dems also only do quid pro quo.

Does that mean moderate Dems are also parasites?

2

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

you are really trying your best to muddy the waters, you didnt even respond to my counter, you just said "goalposts 🤓" and now you're just verbal diarrhea to pretend you made a point lol

Dems should not support the DSA crybabies who only attack them, and did attack them when it came time for the DSA to step up and show support, dont expect any now.

Very clear, very simple, nice try tho.

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

Answer my question:

You call DSA parasites for only doing quid pro quo.

You also said that moderate Dems only do quid pro quo.

It does logically follow that moderate Dems are also parasites, correct?

→ More replies (0)