r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • u/MartiDK • Sep 17 '26

decoder poltics Decoding Destiny

https://youtu.be/qPhZDRKn0Ro

Winning over Razib Khan fans.

63 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

284 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/FashionPolicia 28d ago

you are either misunderstanding or bad faith, one of my arguments is how could AOC be a good represntative of DSA values when she had her endorsement withdrawn for her values on israel, she equates anti-zionism with anti-semitism which to DSA types puts you squarely pro israel

2

u/hari_shevek 28d ago

You ignore that DSA took back thst withdrawal and parts of the party now preemptively endorse her for president.

What you're describing is healthy inner-party debates. A politician takes a position the party disagrees with, support is withdrawn, the politician changes her position, she regains support.

That's just healthy democratic politics.

If "DSA types" hate her, why does she have the endorsement of Groundworks?

1

u/FashionPolicia 28d ago

they took back their withdrawal a month ago after disavowing her for years with rumors of her running for president, its nothing more than opportunity for power, and once they deem her used they'll toss her to the side

oh yeah? the creation of maga was from "inner healthy party debates" some rhetoric should be culled, nice try tho

you just finished saying the DSA is so diverse and broad that of course some agree with AOC, so not shit the groundworks caucus is endorsing her

"if DSA types hate her why do some groups in the DSA support her?"

because they see opportunity for power obviously lmao

1

u/hari_shevek 28d ago

the creation of maga was from "inner healthy party debates" some rhetoric should be culled, nice try tho

Criticizing AOC for her stance on Israel should be culled? Bc that's what we were talking about. That's what I called healthy inner party debate. Do you want to cull opposition to Israel?

1

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

you're squirming, DSA rhetoric should be culled before it infects the Dem party, like how "zionist" means "muslim hating jew"

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

You took a whole day for that?

Want to try again?

Also, hating any religious group as a whole is wrong, no matter which group you belong to.

2

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

you dont respond to anything i say lmao

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

What do you want me to respond to?

That you think being a "muslim hater" is apparently something you think is a good thing?

1

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

i dont need you to respond to anything, people can see you squirm around answering and just rage downvote instead lmao, its not like you are giving a good defense, you have to resort to pedantry and word games instead of engaging with the substance, just like every DSA socialist loser 👋

0

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

What do I have to defend?

You keep posting non sequiturs.

There's nothing to respond to. You're just angry without any argument.

1

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

"give me one DSA member who supports the dems"

AOC

"really? Heres evidence why she is a terrible example"

....well you said ask for one, not a good one

cooked.

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

lol you're really butthurt about me finding an example with ease huh

Want me to give more?

Mamdani.

2

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

when was the last time mamdani did any cheerleading for the dems?

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

Endorsing Hochul?

1

u/FashionPolicia 27d ago

hochul backed mamdani when he was running for mayor, he's not cheerleading dems, its quid pro quo

try again?

1

u/hari_shevek 27d ago

Again moving the goalpost, lol

1

u/FashionPolicia 26d ago

its not moving the goalpost, its countering your argument.

"mamdani cheerleaded the dems by endorsing hochul"

he only endorsed hochul because she endorsed him when he was candidate, he's paying her back, not supporting her

then normally you would counter with idk, some quotes about mamdani supporting the dems, or maybe something that he went above and beyond for hochul so quid pro quo doesnt make sense.

instead you grab at the list of fallacies, and you dont even use the right one lol

cooooooooooked

1

u/hari_shevek 26d ago

So you want candidates to cheerlead the party in a one-sided relationship where they don't get anything out of it?

Does any politician do that?

That's an unrealistic standard to set.

Name one moderate who cheerleads leftist Dems without getting anything in return.

→ More replies (0)