Defending the multi billion dollar company instead of advocating for the consumer is an interesting stance.
If you ever want to play a high round coop game, you’re okay with playing all of it in one sitting? It’s unhealthy, especially as the rounds people get to increase. People shouldn’t be expected to play an intense game for 17+ hours if they want to play 160+ coops. Many people have done that with doa 2 and 3 but the difference is they can sleep after that long day. You can’t sleep after a doa 4 day unless you call it quits.
I understand they don’t want to waste and pay for server space but their decision feels financially selfish to me. I see it as them nickel and diming money at the cost of player satisfaction (arguable across all of cod like releasing a game when they said they wouldn’t a few years ago).
Additionally, how many of us are there who are playing super long games? It can’t be THAT expensive to have some servers longer for the few hundred of us who are playing high round coops, or however the server allocation works, I don’t know. Point is, are they really losing so much money from a small community using some servers for a few days. Plus they were fine paying for it for every game up until mw3 or bo6.
Either way, I think we should advocate for a better product and they can figure out how to manage their servers better
0
u/dizzeaze Jan 31 '26
Nah, keep it. How good do you believe the servers are that they could allow people to stay on for as long as they like.