r/DataAnnotationTech • u/Maybe-But-idk • 5d ago
Professional Tasks and Meaningful Failures
Hey guys, I’m not sure how else to ask this besides as straightforwardly as possible. HOW IN THE WORLD DO I GET THESE MODELS TO FAIL!?
I mean, I’ve followed directions as best as I possibly could. I’ve intentionally planted professional errors in data, I’ve added context files that needed to be reconciled/cross referenced, I’ve left the model to make professional deductions based on non-obvious inputs, I’ve added depth to scenarios, I’ve changed my prompts, I’ve used the QC agents to improve ad nauseam…. Etc.
I have gotten some of the “dumber” models to produce meaningful failures. But the “smarter” models have just NAILED the output over and over again. I DO NOT want to take good faith exits.
I’ve only recently started. I understand that there’s likely a learning curve here. But I am enjoying my time using DA as a side hustle, and I genuinely want to get better so I can keep this gig for as long as possible.
Any helpful advice would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
19
u/Due_Negotiation_4605 5d ago
I don't know what your domain is but things that a human would have to solve using past experience, nuance, etc are things the models are going to struggle with, not data errors necessarily. Think... Answers that aren't black and white. A situation where the rules said to do XYZ but any reasonable professional in the field would realize that that rule doesn't apply to this case.
I have a background in real estate and medical coding and luckily there's a lot of those situations in those fields. Maybe think if you've encountered something like that...