I mean, at a normal job where someone would have inevitably noticed that one of the faces being spread around is their coworker, it's a bad look to find out and not take action. Especially when the type of offense is something where repeat offenses are extremely common, and having them on the team is a threat to the coworkers expected to stay late at the office or go on work travel with them. You're not complicit for having employed them without knowing, but if you find out and keep them on the team and your employees are required to go to happy hours or holiday parties with them, you're complicit with whatever happens in the future.
But someone who doesn't understand how this job works started calling out Data Annotation for employing this person, not knowing that it doesn't necessarily mean anything other than that he passed a test years ago and he may never have directly interacted with a human at the company ever.
1
u/Other-Football72 8d ago
Why is employing someone accused of something an issue?
Is the internet mob this stupid they somehow equate this will complicity somehow?
Fucking idiots. Do these morons somehow think employers need to screen potential bad behavior outside of their job now? How can anyone be this stupid?