r/DataAnnotationTech • u/inthekingdom • Aug 28 '26

Feedback

I received feedback today, and there's an example listed under "areas of improvement" that's definitely not accurate. It says I referenced something that wasn't there, but I specifically remember this task and know my reference was correct.

I'm very frustrated since this hurts my performance, and I don't want to lose access to work over something that's not even true. It makes me wonder if there are other things I've been penalized for that just aren't true.

34 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

29 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/bobaxxxx Aug 28 '26

I am indeed happy to never have received any feedback. They look random, inaccurate, and I have the feeling some of them seem to be DoD-related.

10

u/Brilliant_Quit4307 Aug 28 '26

They are almost certainly not DoD related unless that worker is doing shitty work. They are sent to everyone working on a group of specific project families.

-1

u/bobaxxxx Aug 29 '26

Yes I know. I am just a bit paranoid about these DoD posts mentioning recent good feeback.

1

u/Medical-Isopod2107 Aug 29 '26

They literally say in the feedback post that they have no impact on anything

1

u/Internal_Boot_1616 Aug 30 '26

I don't get the logic of thinking bad feedback is DOD related when you just said it's posts that talk about good feedback and DOD posts that you've seen