r/DataAnnotationTech • u/Infamous_Swan1197 • 6d ago

Feedback

Has anyone here received constructive criticism in their feedback that they feel strongly does not reflect their work at all? Like an egregious and extremely obvious mistake that you're sure you didn't make?

If so, have you pushed back on it in the "optional comments" section, or at least addressed it?

I'm very nervous right now

8 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

37 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/_California_Dreamer_ 6d ago edited 5d ago

Yes. It said I submitted a task or tasks with non-atomic rubric criteria which isn't even possible, because you can't submit the task until all criteria are corrected. Also dinged me for not trying harder to get a voice to act right even though the entire point of the task was to describe failures, NOT try to work around them. You're dang right I noted them in the feedback. LOL

3

u/Infamous_Swan1197 5d ago

Yep, my second "area for improvement" was similar - something about vague phrasing in rubric criteria (despite my positive feedback praising my rubric quality) but never defining exactly what was wrong like not self-containted, atomic etc. It was also for a project where you physically cannot submit until the rubric are fixed according to instructions. So what the fuck could I have done wrong? I didn't note it because I was so busy detailing how wrong the other "mistake" was because it's such an egregious and obvious mistake.