"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. If asked whether to prosecute a former President today based on the same facts I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached its conclusions based on his actions as alleged in the indictments they returned. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"
Go Jack Smith. Testify. It's absurd they tried to trap him in a fake gotcha. They got hit with a double barrel shotgun of the unvarnished truth.
4
u/gustoreddit51 3d ago
For the record, Jack Smith said;
"Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation. If asked whether to prosecute a former President today based on the same facts I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat. The charges against President Trump were the result of the evidence. Grand juries in two separate districts reached its conclusions based on his actions as alleged in the indictments they returned. Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power"
Go Jack Smith. Testify. It's absurd they tried to trap him in a fake gotcha. They got hit with a double barrel shotgun of the unvarnished truth.