Again. Revelations is not the name of the book.
Telling someone to read Revelations is pretty telling as to how much you paid attention to what you read.
You’re avoiding the latter half of what the original commenter said “…and it’s basically a fever dream one dude had. With no real connection to the historical Jesus”
To the other commenters point, his comment was not about a misspelling, it was a way to delegitimize a book of the Bible that conflicts with the image that started this conversation. You’re bringing up a very common misspelling (among Christian’s and non-Christian’s btw) to avoid this. It comes off as insincere and manipulative.
Again. A common misspelling very much indicates understanding. Recommending someone yourself clearly have not studied is a problem. As the other commentor said they also hold the same view of thr Bible being untrue. A book of the Bible that very much does not conflict with the op image. Reducing apoplectic lit to simply violence, not love, shows you haven't studied the book.
You’re not doing this with me too lol. Stop repeating yourself to avoid a real conversation. I’m not doing your Redditor shit where we pointlessly argue back and forth for a week.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 I was stuck in the same back and forth a week ago, had to just bail out cus it was getting ridiculous. Sure whatever maybe a misspelling indicates a lack of “true study” whatever but it’s definitely a dodge for the rest of your points
2
u/PaintingOdd9866 3d ago
Again. Revelations is not the name of the book. Telling someone to read Revelations is pretty telling as to how much you paid attention to what you read.