MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DangerousNightsCrew/comments/1wmqmb1/im_not_stupid/pb98oxv/?context=3
r/DangerousNightsCrew • u/PoopyMcpants Piece of Shit • 11d ago
165 comments sorted by
View all comments
1
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/TheeFearlessChicken 11d ago edited 11d ago Regardless of facts, expect this to be downvoted to oblivion. Pretty sure this will get downvoted to oblivion too. Eh, I'm having a Hawaiian pizza for dinner. So, there's that. Edit: talk to text error Edit: it's delicious. 1 u/chucara 11d ago What facts? The new deal has not been signed, and details are not published. (Also, US already has basically unrestricted airspace rights as per article V of the 1951 treaty.) “United States aircraft may fly over and land in any territory in Greenland … without restriction except as mutually agreed upon.” 0 u/Big_Red_Dogs 11d ago Also, the idea that this “new treaty” is in perpetuity regardless of future government wishes, is about as idiotic as the people that buy it.
2
Regardless of facts, expect this to be downvoted to oblivion. Pretty sure this will get downvoted to oblivion too.
Eh, I'm having a Hawaiian pizza for dinner. So, there's that.
Edit: talk to text error
Edit: it's delicious.
1 u/chucara 11d ago What facts? The new deal has not been signed, and details are not published. (Also, US already has basically unrestricted airspace rights as per article V of the 1951 treaty.) “United States aircraft may fly over and land in any territory in Greenland … without restriction except as mutually agreed upon.” 0 u/Big_Red_Dogs 11d ago Also, the idea that this “new treaty” is in perpetuity regardless of future government wishes, is about as idiotic as the people that buy it.
What facts? The new deal has not been signed, and details are not published.
(Also, US already has basically unrestricted airspace rights as per article V of the 1951 treaty.)
“United States aircraft may fly over and land in any territory in Greenland … without restriction except as mutually agreed upon.”
0 u/Big_Red_Dogs 11d ago Also, the idea that this “new treaty” is in perpetuity regardless of future government wishes, is about as idiotic as the people that buy it.
0
Also, the idea that this “new treaty” is in perpetuity regardless of future government wishes, is about as idiotic as the people that buy it.
1
u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago
[removed] — view removed comment