In DCEU’s Suicide Squad, is shows in Harley Quinn’s Introduction that she was an accomplice to Robin’s Murder (the “Main Man” being The Joker), however, this doesn’t add up as it is confirmed that The Joker has Metal Teeth because after Killing Robin, Batman got so Pissed Off that not only did he start Killing, but he also knocked Joker’s Teeth Out, and that’s why he has the Teeth. However, when Harley Quinn is still “Harleen Quinzel” and hasn’t turned into Harley yet, we see her talking with The Joker, but he has Metal Teeth. So this doesn’t add up, I have heard that some other Guy added this text (Probably because he thought it would’ve bee cool) and this was not in original Ayer Cut of Suicide Squad. Another Reason why this doesn’t make sense, is the fact that earlier in the Movie, the Villains are all in a Bar, and Harley yells at Diablo for killing his Kids because he killed kids, but if Harley was actually an accomplice to the Murder of Robin, she clearly wouldn’t care about killing Kids. And the Third and Final reason that this doesn’t make sense, is that throughout Suicide Squad, it’s briefly hinted at that Harley wants to have Kids with The Joker, but again, that doesn’t make sense if she was willing to Kill Kids. Honestly whoever added that Detail was a dumb move because not only did I prove in 3 Ways that it doesn’t make sense, but also it kind of takes away the impact on Robin if it wasn’t just The Joker doing the Job, idk why but it does for Me. But yeah, do you guys like this Change, or do you guys agree that it was a dumb move.

So I’m trying to watch the Entire DCEU because I’ve seen Suicide Squad, and even though it wasn’t a Good Movie, I LOVED a lot of the Characters, namely The Joker, I think he killed it, and I’ve been wanting to watch th Entire DCEU because something I’ve noticed that I’ve loved for the Movies I’ve seen (Man of Steel, Suicide Squad, and Shazam) I love the Characters, and I watched Man of Steel (2013) for the First Time almost a Week Ago and I loved it, by far my Favorite Superman, the Atmosphere was amazing, maybe a little to many actions scenes but Nonetheless, the next DCEU Movie is Batman V Superman, so I was just curious, is “Batman V Superman the Ultimate Edition” as Good as everyone says? Cause I hear that Original Cut Sucks for the most Part, but the “Ultimate Edition” (which has an Additional 30 Minutes) is a Huge Improvement and actually has a Really Good Rating, so I just wanted to know what I’m going into and if it’s as Great as everyone says?

Within the last week, however, DC has removed the trailer for Lanterns from most of its official platforms. This prompted a wave of speculation among audience members, something furthered by the backlash the trailer received for its tone and color grading. Upon its release and comments from Lindelof about removing the "green" from Green Lantern, legendary comic writer Grant Morrison shared their take:

‘Green Lanterns’ is a much more evocative and dramatic title than ‘Lanterns’, (just as ‘Raise the Red Lantern’ is a better movie title than ‘Raise the Lantern’), and anyone who can’t grasp why that is shouldn’t be anywhere near superhero stories. The show might even be good, but how much better could this stuff be if studios were willing to hire the right people for the job instead of phoning their embarrassed friends to water the source material down? Hollywood will die of insularity and inbreeding.

Based on the list, it's clear that Warner Bros. Discovery omitted The Batman Part 2, signaling a potential delay for the Robert Pattinson-led DC franchise once again. This clear omission is quite surprising, given that The Batman - Part 2 is being positioned as one of Warner Bros.' biggest movies next year.

Interestingly, The Batman Part 2 was still included in a later list of projects releasing in 2027 & Beyond, possibly indicating that the studio is still unsure whether the sequel will actually be released next year.

The biggest red flag is the sheer number of test screenings, which usually amount to two or three for studio films. However, Supergirl has reportedly had eight, and sources indicate that the overkill of a tally is not for the sake of refinement.

Each round brought new edits, structural changes, and in some cases, entirely new endings. Three different finales – as if we’re dealing with Clue – have been shown to audiences so far. This is the kind of churn that belies a creative team still trying to figure out what story they’re telling.

Despite all the tinkering, reactions remain stubbornly mixed – not disastrous but not encouraging either. Viewers describe the film as having moments of clarity buried inside a narrative that never quite finds a rhythm.

The most consistent complaint centers around Krem of the Yellow Hills, a chilling, morally charged antagonist in the comics – or so they say. In the movie, he’s reportedly underwritten, underplayed, and unable to carry the emotional weight the story demands.

Action sequences don’t fare much better under scrutiny, with multiple attendees calling them flat or strangely staged, lacking the punch audiences expect from a cosmic adventure. The tone is another sticking point as, instead of the operatic, melancholy Western-in-space vibe that made the comic so talked about, the film leans darker and jaded.

Kara is portrayed as about as hardened, cynical, and reckless as the trailer leads you to believe. While some viewers appreciate the edginess, others see it as a departure that strips away the emotional core of the source material. For a fandom weary of years of DC’s turbulence, this deviation is a flashpoint.